2020
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2020.1730373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive variable-parameters scheme for the simultaneous monitoring of the mean and variability of an autocorrelated multivariate normal process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results, most of the efforts used nonadaptive (FP) control charts and only a few papers involve adaptive control charts. Nenes and Panagiotidou, 46 Wang et al, 50 Salmasnia et al, 70 Tasias and Nenes, 74 Sabahno et al, 82 Sabahno et al 83 and Sabahno et al 33 are the seven articles that considered adaptive control charts in joint monitoring.…”
Section: Adaptive Control Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the results, most of the efforts used nonadaptive (FP) control charts and only a few papers involve adaptive control charts. Nenes and Panagiotidou, 46 Wang et al, 50 Salmasnia et al, 70 Tasias and Nenes, 74 Sabahno et al, 82 Sabahno et al 83 and Sabahno et al 33 are the seven articles that considered adaptive control charts in joint monitoring.…”
Section: Adaptive Control Chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, examining how measurement errors affect joint monitoring schemes by discussing auto-correlated data for various time series models can be conducted in the future. To date, there is only one paper 83 that deals with an adaptive scheme for joint monitoring of auto-correlated processes. 9.…”
Section: Conclusion and Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection in production systems can be done easily and quickly thanks to industrial automation, which in turns facilitates the statistical analysis of processes. In addition, production systems are partly dynamically driven so, if the data are collected at a higher rate, the observations are expected to be autocorrelated 27 . Some examples include steel foundries, blast furnace operations, wastewater treatment plants, chemical processes, tin/copper layer diode composition, semiconductors, injection moulding, temperature readout for ceramic furnaces, rolling mill operations, water toxicity, cavities in the same casting, integrated circuits, adding potassium to yogurt production and mechanical pieces, pharmaceutical industry, paint production, among others 28,29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method is to revise the upper and lower control limits of control charts to achieve an expected performance. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The third approach is to use residual control charts. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] In this case, the residuals are obtained by subtracting predicted values from observed values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, because only every 10th data is used, the discovery of process shifts may be delayed. The second method is to revise the upper and lower control limits of control charts to achieve an expected performance 9–18 . The third approach is to use residual control charts 19–26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%