2017
DOI: 10.5755/j01.itc.46.1.13051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Additive Fahp Based Sentence Score Function for Text Summarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, by combining (12), (13), and (14), the ideal solution and the negative ideal solution were obtained. Subsequently, by substituting these solutions and preference weights into (15) and (16), the utility measure and the regret measure were obtained, respectively, and by incorporating these values into (17), the MPCI value (i.e., VIKOR index) was computed. Finally, by using the MPCI value, the experimental samples were ranked.…”
Section: Obtaining Mpcimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, by combining (12), (13), and (14), the ideal solution and the negative ideal solution were obtained. Subsequently, by substituting these solutions and preference weights into (15) and (16), the utility measure and the regret measure were obtained, respectively, and by incorporating these values into (17), the MPCI value (i.e., VIKOR index) was computed. Finally, by using the MPCI value, the experimental samples were ranked.…”
Section: Obtaining Mpcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of affective responses has the features of fuzziness. When measuring affective responses, traditional methods such as semantic differential scales and Likert scales employ numerical values that do not exactly represent a perceptual interpretation because human perceptual interpretation of affective responses involves inherent imprecision or vagueness to a certain extent [13][14][15][16]. By contrast, fuzzy sets are a generalization of crisp sets for representing imprecision or vagueness in everyday life, which can serve as a means for modeling the vagueness underlying most natural linguistic terms [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naïve Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and convolutional neural network learning algorithms are used as base classifiers in this study. There are many integration methods that combine decisions of base classifiers to obtain a final decision [8][9][10][11]. For ensemble integration, we used majority voting and stacking methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also calculated the Euclidean distances S + i and S À i using the information in Table 10 and formulas (13) and ( Subsequently, the GC coefficient matrices R + , R À were obtained according to formulas (17) and (20), and the GC degrees R Step 6. Finally, the dimensionless method was applied to normalize S …”
Section: Evaluation Of Traffic Congestion Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDM techniques actually assist decision makers to choose the most reasonable program by assessing such problems. As far as we know, many methods exist for evaluating traffic problems: for example, the AHP, [13][14][15][16] the FAHP, [17][18][19] TOPSIS, 20 AHP-TOPSIS, 21 AHP-evidential reasoning, 22,23 GRA, Decision-Making and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and the AHP-TOPSIS-GC. 24,25 At present, many scholars have done an in-depth study of traffic problems, and most of researches focus on MCDM techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%