2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An advanced perspective on the predictability in hedge fund returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that past information available to investors can be optimally combined into a performance forecast via an econometric model to predict hedge fund performance, but predictability at the level of the individual fund is fairly limited (cf. Wegener, von Nitzsch andCengiz, 2010, andAvramov, Barras andKosowski, 2013).…”
Section: Forecast Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that past information available to investors can be optimally combined into a performance forecast via an econometric model to predict hedge fund performance, but predictability at the level of the individual fund is fairly limited (cf. Wegener, von Nitzsch andCengiz, 2010, andAvramov, Barras andKosowski, 2013).…”
Section: Forecast Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different model/variable selection strategies have been used in the literature to cope with this problem. The methods of stepwise regression and of backward elimination have been widely used in hedge fund literature to identify significant pricing risk factors; see, for example, Agarwal and Naik (2004) and Wegener et al (2010). The use of information criteria is one other approach to variable selection; see, for example, Vrontos et al (2008) who used different statistical criteria for the determination of valuable factors in hedge fund pricing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this stepwise procedure is a standard approach for model selection, recent papers on hedge fund returns (see Vrontos et al, 2008;Wegener et al, 2010) highlight the benefits of using at this stage a GARCH-type model for the variance of the residuals. However, the literature generally considers the cases of static betas (see Vrontos et al, 2008) and in-sample rolling-window estimators (see Wegener et al, 2010). Since adapting such a complex specification to the state-space model introduced hereafter is not straightforward, we do not consider time-varying volatility coefficients in our return decomposition approach.…”
Section: þmentioning
confidence: 99%