2013
DOI: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.22684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An advisory program for first- and second-year medical students: the Weill Cornell experience

Abstract: PurposeFirst-year students negotiate new professional culture with a certain amount of excitement and anxiety. There are different approaches for offering guidance. In this study, the authors present Weill Cornell Medical College's experience with an advising program for first- and second-year students.MethodsFifty faculty advisors were each assigned 1–3 first-year students who they would follow for 2 years. The responsibilities were outlined to both faculty and students. The program was evaluated using an ano… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common model of mentorship used was the traditional dyad model, which was used exclusively by 16 programs [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] .…”
Section: Mentoring Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common model of mentorship used was the traditional dyad model, which was used exclusively by 16 programs [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] .…”
Section: Mentoring Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most programs stated broad objectives including assisting medical students with career development/career planning 2,10,12,14,30 , professional development 11,12,19,23,24,26,30,32,33 , and well-being 29,32 .…”
Section: Program Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the students who do not regularly visit their academic advisor personally try to establish communication with their academic advisor. [ 17 ] Another result of the present study, in the students' opinion, was the academic advisors' low score in “oral and written” field. This field means the academic advisors' ability to use sentences and words in oral and written forms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…4,5 Students of the health professions face academic and professional issues that may differ from students in other degree programs. [6][7][8] In evaluating the literature on medical and nursing students, satisfaction with faculty mentorship and advising seems to be dependent on meeting at least once with a faculty advisor. 6,7 There is a deficit, however, in the literature regarding best practices for facilitating an introduction between faculty advisors and students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%