An AHP‐based framework for selecting knowledge management tools to sustain innovation process

Grimaldi, Michele; Rippa, Pierluigi

doi:10.1002/kpm.365

Cited by 58 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The technique has been successfully implemented in various fields, such as logistics management [30][31][32]; manufacturing [31][32][33]; health care management [34,35]; environmental management [7,36,37]; marketing [38]; and knowledge management [39][40][41]. AHP has also been used in various contexts for ranking/prioritizing options, as well as selecting between alternatives (decision making) [42].…”

Section: Overview Of Analytical Hierarchical Process (Ahp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying Analytical Hierarchical Process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain

Malik

Abdallah

Hussain

2016

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Overview Of Analytical Hierarchical Process (Ahp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying Analytical Hierarchical Process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain

Malik

Abdallah

Hussain

2016

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this method, a hierarchical structure is developed to represent the factors given in the alternative selection problem. (Saaty, 1990), (Grimaldi & Rippa, 2011) o Fuzzy AHP (Chang, 1996), (Chi et al, 2008), (Sarfaraz, Jenab, Weinsier, 2012), Decision Analysis (DA)-Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)…”

Section: Methods Description Reference(s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

i-DEMATEL method for integrated manufacturing technology selection

Jenab¹,

Sarfaraz

Weinsier

et al. 2015

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – Computer integrated manufacturing (CIM) refers the manufacturing concept based on the use of computers to control and exchange information for the entire production process. As a result, manufacturing can be faster and less error-prone. However, managing and implementing technologies in the CIM environment are challenging processes for managements and manufacturing organizations. These processes become complex and tedious when one is dealing with many decision parameters. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This study reports an Interval Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (i-DEMATEL) method for evaluating and selecting the CIM technologies that takes into account management objectives. This method can relieve the limitation of the relationship matrix about the assumption of the symmetrical relationship. As a result, it can solve complicated relationship structure problems. Findings – Based on a survey on the current technologies in manufacturing institutes, a case study is demonstrated to present the application of the model. The i-DEMATEL approach takes into account all decision parameters for evaluating and implementing CIM technologies and shows CNC/DNC technology is the most suitable for this case study. Originality/value – The proposed method mitigates the shortcomings of non-fuzzy and fuzzy methods in pertaining literature.

show abstract

“…This method can be utilized to assess intangibles, due to the possibility to evaluate quantitative and qualitative. Furthermore, IC components have no scale of measurement, but can be quantified through relative importance [62].…”

Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Relative Importance of Intellectual Capital Determinants, Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach: Case Study - Mellat Bank of Iran

Shad¹,

Nedjati²,

Shafiei³

2017

J Bus Fin Aff

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

it is essential to offer valuations associate with shares of intangible properties, since administrators require to spot their company's most precious resources. Furthermore, focusing on how much important these assets are, it is valuable to determine the intangible assets' status in value creation procedure. When generating value, competitive advantage is accomplished with the ideal use of intangibles [13]. Whenever a company's administration is not conscious of what its intangible properties are, it could miss beneficial opportunities depending on these intangible capitals, since key decisions will made without considering all possible variables [14].The main aim of this paper is identifying and quantifying the relative importance of various IC determinants in Mellat Bank of Iran. The ANN and Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods are used to determine and quantify the three main determinants of the IC. The ANN results are compared with direct evaluating of human by AHP. Many scholars have examined categorization models for projects selection and evaluation by Analytic Hierarchy Process method [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and Mehralian et al. [22], used fuzzy TOPSIS for Prioritization of IC indicators; But innovation of this research is evaluating the relative importance of IC factors by ANN. Intellectual capital backgroundBy a close review of Intellectual Capital literature, it is observed that all existing models of IC evaluation are identified three similar determinants for IC [23]. Based on some pioneers opinion IC is composed of three main components [11,[24][25][26][27][28] IntroductionBy the growth of the modern economy, that is primarily powered by knowledge and information, is credited towards the improved dominance of intellectual capital (IC) as an investigation subject [1]. Drucker was pioneered in appearance of a novel economy, known as the knowledge contemporary society [2]. He states that in this modern society, knowledge is not only an additional source together with the conventional aspects of production (land, labor, and capital) however it is typically the solely significant resource for manufacturing [3]. In the last decade, there is a more focus on the knowledge participation in global competitiveness in 21st century. Knowledge is known as an indelible strategic resource to gain and sustain reasonably competitive benefits [4,5]. Since IC is based on knowledge, it is the central part of organizational capabilities. The necessity of improvement and upgrading this knowledge has never been focused. Core competencies represent organizational excellence scopes, which are resulted from capabilities combinations [6].In recent century, IC has become the main asset of large international companies. Tangible properties include physical property (machines, land, and buildings) and current property (inventory). The other category comprises intangible properties: individuals as well as their skills, business procedures and market assets including customer loyalty, recurring business reputation, and so on [7]....

show abstract

An AHP‐based framework for selecting knowledge management tools to sustain innovation process

Cited by 58 publications

References 39 publications

Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying Analytical Hierarchical Process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain

Assessing supplier environmental performance: Applying Analytical Hierarchical Process in the United Arab Emirates healthcare chain

i-DEMATEL method for integrated manufacturing technology selection

Relative Importance of Intellectual Capital Determinants, Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach: Case Study - Mellat Bank of Iran

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About