1972
DOI: 10.1097/00004397-197203000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Aid in the Differential Diagnosis of Intraocular Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
5

Year Published

1976
1976
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…3) In all the cases, the fluorescein-angio graphic findings were the same as those de scribed by Gass [3]. (1) A coarse fluorescent vascular pattern in the prearterial and arte rial angiographic phases ( fig.…”
Section: Biomicroscopic Examination Locationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…3) In all the cases, the fluorescein-angio graphic findings were the same as those de scribed by Gass [3]. (1) A coarse fluorescent vascular pattern in the prearterial and arte rial angiographic phases ( fig.…”
Section: Biomicroscopic Examination Locationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…[23,24] Macular changes can include serous retinal detachment, degeneration of the overlying retina, hard exudates, retinal pigment epithelial changes, macular pucker or epiretinal membrane formation and chronic cystic changes. [19,25] …”
Section: Diagnosis Ophthalmoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remainder were considered to be astrocytic proliferations and they were all circumscribed lesions formed chiefly by well-differentiated astrocytes [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], the majority being situated on, or contiguous with, the optic nerve head. There is another case [16] which is referred to by Reeser et al [11] as similar to their own, and a report [17] of glial tissue filling a congenitally abnormal eye which is claimed to represent an astro cytoma, but is better classified as massive gliosis. The tumour described by Rosa [18], although referred to as a retinal glioma, is illustrated as lying deep to the ciliary epithe lium and is not an astrocytic tumour histo logically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%