2016
DOI: 10.3991/ijoe.v12i08.5958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Alert Fusion Method Based on Grey Relation and Attribute Similarity Correlation

Abstract: Abstract-Various security devices which produce a large volume of logs and alerts have been used widely. It is such a troublesome and time-consuming task for network managers to analyze and deal with the information. This paper presented an improved alerts aggregation method based on grey correlation and attribute similarity method. We used grey correlation to ascertain the importance of alert attributes in network security, and considered it as the weight of attributes. Then we combined with the attribute sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three methods have become representative methods in recent years. They are the no-weight method, scheme 1 [ 29 ] and scheme 2 [ 31 ], which are different from our method in terms of the attribute weight determination and aggregation method. The no-weight method assigns the same weight to each attribute, and its aggregation method is the same as ours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These three methods have become representative methods in recent years. They are the no-weight method, scheme 1 [ 29 ] and scheme 2 [ 31 ], which are different from our method in terms of the attribute weight determination and aggregation method. The no-weight method assigns the same weight to each attribute, and its aggregation method is the same as ours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The no-weight method assigns the same weight to each attribute, and its aggregation method is the same as ours. Scheme 1 [ 29 ] and scheme 2 [ 31 ] adopt different attribute weighting methods and aggregation methods. Therefore, these three methods and our method have comparative significance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations