2015
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2014.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm and upper bounds for the weighted maximal planar graph problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the MWPSP is known to be strongly NP-hard [6] it should come as no surprise that exact algorithms are capable of solving general MWPSP instances with only a relatively small number of vertices [1,7] and that reported research has focused mainly on approximate and heuristic methods and the improvement of the solutions they generate [8]. The present note reports new results on solution properties and improvement strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the MWPSP is known to be strongly NP-hard [6] it should come as no surprise that exact algorithms are capable of solving general MWPSP instances with only a relatively small number of vertices [1,7] and that reported research has focused mainly on approximate and heuristic methods and the improvement of the solutions they generate [8]. The present note reports new results on solution properties and improvement strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This problem is commonly formulated in terms of graph theory and is known as the maximum-weight planar subgraph problem (MWPSP). The MWPSP has some important applications: (i) as a subproblem of the plant (facility) layout problem in industrial engineering, where the vertices represent the activities of the facility and the edges the adjacencies between them in a plan of the facility [1] (ii) integrated circuit design -where the vertices are the electrical elements and the edges represent the physical connections between them [2] (iii) systems biology, where the vertices represent proteins and edges represent protein interactions in a metabolic network [3], (iv) social system analysis -where the vertices represent social agents (e.g. individuals, groups or companies) and edges represent social interaction [4], and (v) the filtering of data in correlation-based graphs in finance [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng (2014) [81] presented a method to generate connectivity graph to contribute the facility layout generation from abstract stage. Ahmadi-Javid et al (2015) [82] recently presented a new formulation of WMPG problem using ILP model and solved it with a cutting plane algorithm.…”
Section: Fig 211 Layout Development By Graph Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has not yet structured the potential vulnerabilities concerned with relational properties between the members of supply chain triads and has not provided a structured analytical approach towards the assessment of such vulnerabilities. We noticed that this issue could be effectively resolved using the modelling apparatus of graph theory, a mathematical approach widely adopted in operations research (e.g., Ahmadi-Javid, Ardestani-Jaafari, Foulds, Hojabri, & Farahani, 2015;Li, Kilgour, & Hipel, 2005;Ng, Cheng, Bandalouski, Kovalyov, & Lam, 2014) The aim of this study is two-fold: (i) using the toolset of graph theory, to model different cross-organizational pathways according to which risks can emerge and propagate in service triads seen as an elementary form of service supply networks; and (ii) to provide a method for vulnerability assessment of the suggested graph models of service triads, taking into consideration the typology and direction of the cross-organizational relationships within graph models of supply chain triads.…”
Section: The Application Of Graph Theory For Vulnerability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%