2015
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/31/11/115011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithmic framework for Mumford–Shah regularization of inverse problems in imaging

Abstract: The Mumford-Shah model is a very powerful variational approach for edge preserving regularization of image reconstruction processes. However, it is algorithmically challenging because one has to deal with a non-smooth and non-convex functional. In this paper, we propose a new efficient algorithmic framework for Mumford-Shah regularization of inverse problems in imaging. It is based on a splitting into specific subproblems that can be solved exactly. We derive fast solvers for the subproblems which are key for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficient iterative strategies have been designed and a recent work by Cai and Steidl [14] establishes the link between a thresholded-ROF strategy and the MS model. The second class relies on the Blake-Zisserman model [15][16][17] which handles the piecewise smoothness by considering a different approximation of MS known as the discrete membrane energy. Convergence to local minimizers was proved for the 1D formulation in [16].…”
Section: Generalities On Mumford-shahmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efficient iterative strategies have been designed and a recent work by Cai and Steidl [14] establishes the link between a thresholded-ROF strategy and the MS model. The second class relies on the Blake-Zisserman model [15][16][17] which handles the piecewise smoothness by considering a different approximation of MS known as the discrete membrane energy. Convergence to local minimizers was proved for the 1D formulation in [16].…”
Section: Generalities On Mumford-shahmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergence to local minimizers was proved for the 1D formulation in [16]. However, the major drawbacks of the extensions to image processing derived in [15] and [17] are the weak convergence guarantees, and the lack of flexibility in the data-term choice, whose proximity operator should have a closed form expression. Finally, for handling with the exact MS model, which estimates jointly the contours and the image, we can refer to Ambrosio-Tortorelli alternatives [18][19][20], at the price of a huge computational time, or the strategy we proposed in [21].…”
Section: Generalities On Mumford-shahmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future directions of research include the adaption to further imaging setups such as magnetic particle imaging and the adaption to the (piecewise smooth) Mumford-Shah functional as in [68].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is straightforward to devise an algorithm for (P k,β,γ ) of complexity O(N 3 ). For the first order problem (P 1,β,γ ), we proposed an O(N 2 ) algorithm [30] which utilizes a fast computation scheme for the approximation errors proposed by Blake [9]. Unfortunately, as that scheme is based on algebraic recurrences, a generalization to arbitrary orders of k seems difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%