1946
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Alternate form of the Wechsler Memory Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons between the raw scores needed to obtain an MQ of 100 in the present sample and in Wechsler's (1945) standardization sample, to which Form 2 of the Scale is referenced (Stone, Girdner, & Albrecht, 1946), reveals that somewhat higher raw scores are required in the present sample over the age of 39 (e.g., 60 for ages 30-59 compared with 58 for 40-44, 56 for 45-49, 54 for 50-54 and 52 for 55-59; 56 for ages 60-69 compared with 50 for ages 60-64 in the American standardization sample). In part this may reflect the fact that Form 2 is somewhat easier than Form 1 (Ivison, 1988;Keesler et al, 1984;McCarty et al, Downloaded by [University of Sussex Library] at 03:12 18 June 2016 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons between the raw scores needed to obtain an MQ of 100 in the present sample and in Wechsler's (1945) standardization sample, to which Form 2 of the Scale is referenced (Stone, Girdner, & Albrecht, 1946), reveals that somewhat higher raw scores are required in the present sample over the age of 39 (e.g., 60 for ages 30-59 compared with 58 for 40-44, 56 for 45-49, 54 for 50-54 and 52 for 55-59; 56 for ages 60-69 compared with 50 for ages 60-64 in the American standardization sample). In part this may reflect the fact that Form 2 is somewhat easier than Form 1 (Ivison, 1988;Keesler et al, 1984;McCarty et al, Downloaded by [University of Sussex Library] at 03:12 18 June 2016 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients and control subjects were subjected to neurological assessment to exclude subjects with neurological deficits. Both groups were then subjected to cognitive functions assessment by the following psychometric tests: (1) the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [10], which assesses orientation, registration, attention, calculation, recall and language, and (2) the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) subtests [11][12][13], which were applied and included digit span, mental control, logical memory, associate learning and visual reproduction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score was the number of easy and difficult associations correctly reproduLced on the final trial. Two equivalent forms of the test are available, which Stone, Girdner, and Albrecht (1946) considered to be well matched for difficulty level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%