2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative approach for bioanalytical assay optimization for wastewater-based epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultracentrifugation and glycine elution was the method of choice to determine the time series of SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations as it resulted in significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 N1 concentrations than the Centricon ® Plus-70 ultrafiltration method (p,0.001) (Figure 2). Some authors, when comparing the recovery results of SARS-CoV-2 or enveloped viruses (MHV, BCoV, PMMoV) obtained by different concentration methods, observed that ultrafiltration using Centricon ® Plus-70 had better performance than other methods such as CP-Select™ ultrafiltration (Forés et al 2021), PEG 8000 precipitation (Guerrity et al 2021), Amicon, Macrosep, Vivaspin ultrafiltration, PEG 8000 precipitation (Boogaerts et al 2021), PEG 6000 precipitation (Bertrand et al 2021) and the adsorption-elution method using electronegative membranes (Sherchan et al 2020). Our comparative study was based on a few samples (n¼13) previously filtered on 0.22 μm membranes (not centrifuged) before the Centricon concentration step, a difference that may have reduced the effectiveness of the method but was necessary for the viability test in cell culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultracentrifugation and glycine elution was the method of choice to determine the time series of SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations as it resulted in significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 N1 concentrations than the Centricon ® Plus-70 ultrafiltration method (p,0.001) (Figure 2). Some authors, when comparing the recovery results of SARS-CoV-2 or enveloped viruses (MHV, BCoV, PMMoV) obtained by different concentration methods, observed that ultrafiltration using Centricon ® Plus-70 had better performance than other methods such as CP-Select™ ultrafiltration (Forés et al 2021), PEG 8000 precipitation (Guerrity et al 2021), Amicon, Macrosep, Vivaspin ultrafiltration, PEG 8000 precipitation (Boogaerts et al 2021), PEG 6000 precipitation (Bertrand et al 2021) and the adsorption-elution method using electronegative membranes (Sherchan et al 2020). Our comparative study was based on a few samples (n¼13) previously filtered on 0.22 μm membranes (not centrifuged) before the Centricon concentration step, a difference that may have reduced the effectiveness of the method but was necessary for the viability test in cell culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the time-proportional sample collection, a high frequency (less than 10 min) was used to compose the daily IWW samples. Then, 500 mL wastewater was immediately stored after collection at 4 °C to prevent in-sample degradation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA [ 43 , 44 ]. At 24 h upon sample collection, RNA extraction of the IWW samples was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was performed according to a previously validated bioanalytical method [ 43 ]. Briefly, 20 mL of IWW was centrifuged at 4000× g for 30 min to remove solid particles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storage and transport conditions can affect the detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples because of stability. Various studies provided sufficient evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is persistent in wastewater samples for several days if samples are stored at 4 °C (Ahmed et al 2020b;Boogaerts et al 2021b). As part of the validation process, we have evaluated sample stability.…”
Section: Sample Transport and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this moment, there is no ideal external control standard with the same properties of SARS-CoV-2 for quantification available (Boogaerts et al 2021b;Chik et al 2021). Therefore, no spike-in control was in use.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%