2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alternative calculation of the consensus degree in group decision making problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Median is a good metric for this purpose as it is not in uenced by extreme values. 42 Further, studies on consensus development [43][44][45][46][47] advocate reporting the MADM to depict the extent of agreement. Like the median, the MADM is a useful measurement of variance in non-parametric studies as it disregards outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median is a good metric for this purpose as it is not in uenced by extreme values. 42 Further, studies on consensus development [43][44][45][46][47] advocate reporting the MADM to depict the extent of agreement. Like the median, the MADM is a useful measurement of variance in non-parametric studies as it disregards outliers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median is a good metric for this purpose as it is not influenced by extreme values [ 44 ]. Further, studies on consensus development [ 45 49 ] advocate reporting the MADM. to depict the extent of agreement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the median, the MADM. is a useful measurement of variance in non-parametric studies as it disregards outliers [ 45 , 49 ]. A MADM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative measures based on statistical variability have been used to measure consensus [5,6]. Inequality measures such as entropy [7] or Gini index [8] have been used in aggregation methods to determine consensus in GDM with linguistic variables and distance-based process among individual assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%