2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11802-008-0027-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis and modeling study of a sea fog event over the Yellow and Bohai Seas

Abstract: In this study, a sea fog event which occurred on 27 March 2005 over the Yellow and Bohai Seas was investigated observationally and numerically. Almost all available observational data were used, including satellite imagery of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES)-9, three data sets from station observations at Dandong, Dalian and Qingdao, objectively reanalyzed data of final run analysis (FNL) issued by the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and Regional Atmospheric Modeling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in Richardson Number also exist between fog and stratus days (Fig.8a). On fog days, turbulence (Ri<0.5) seems readily to occur at two levels: one being below 200 m in the mixing layer, and the other between 500-600 m. The latter is very likely associated with the existence of the dry layer, which allows heat to escape from the top of the fog by longwave radiation, thus leading to cooling and turbulence, and this physical process, being very important for the formation of sea fogs, has been proved by numerical simulations (Gao et al, 2007;Fu et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2006). The lapse rates on fog days are greater than on stratus days at 500-800 m altitude, which is consistent with the stronger turbulence between 500-600 m (Fig.8b), confirming further the contribution made by the dry layer.…”
Section: Contrast Between Fog and Stratusmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Differences in Richardson Number also exist between fog and stratus days (Fig.8a). On fog days, turbulence (Ri<0.5) seems readily to occur at two levels: one being below 200 m in the mixing layer, and the other between 500-600 m. The latter is very likely associated with the existence of the dry layer, which allows heat to escape from the top of the fog by longwave radiation, thus leading to cooling and turbulence, and this physical process, being very important for the formation of sea fogs, has been proved by numerical simulations (Gao et al, 2007;Fu et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2006). The lapse rates on fog days are greater than on stratus days at 500-800 m altitude, which is consistent with the stronger turbulence between 500-600 m (Fig.8b), confirming further the contribution made by the dry layer.…”
Section: Contrast Between Fog and Stratusmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies show that springtime fog in Qingdao is often associated with sea fog over the Yellow Sea (Fu et al, 2008;Gao et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2012). The Yellow sea fog is typical advection fog, occurring when prevailing southerlies transport moist and warm air from low latitude northward to the sea surface (Sugimoto et al, 2013;Gao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In some early attempts to numerically simulate sea fog, many scholars employed mesoscale forecasting models (Ballard et al, 1991;Golding, 1993;Nakanishi, 2000;Pagowski et al, 2004;Koračin et al, 2005). Mesoscale models have been used to simulate the formation of sea fog in China since the turn of the century, and the corresponding mechanisms have been investigated (Fu et al, 2004;Fu et al, 2006;Fu et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2012;Cheng et al, 2013;Huang et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2019). Focusing on ten cases of sea fog over the Yellow Sea (YS) in spring, Lu et al (2014) carried out a sensitivity study on the parameterization schemes of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and found that the best combination of the boundary layer scheme and the microphysical scheme comprises the Yonsei University (YSU) scheme and the Purdue Lin scheme, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%