2021
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.2019-0095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Chinese Preservice Physical Education Teachers’ Beliefs About the Physical Education Profession

Abstract: Purpose: This study investigated beliefs about the physical education (PE) profession of Chinese preservice physical education teachers (PPETs). Methods: Chinese PPETs (N = 660) from six universities participated in the study. Data were collected using a prevalidated survey—a scale of measuring Chinese PPETs’ beliefs about the PE profession, which consists of two domains: a sense of calling and the value of the PE profession. Anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other studies, some scholars also study the professional qualities of teachers of English, science, sports, history, mental health education, music, mathematics, history, information technology, and other disciplines in primary and secondary schools, as well as college English, sports, tourism management, mental health education, ideological and political, business English, and other professional teachers, such as Childs et al [7], Edwards et al [8], and Dong [9]. From the perspective of research, it is mainly from the perspective of pedagogy, and Keating et al [10] cut into the research of teachers' professional quality from the perspective of inclusive education concept and human resource management concept. From the perspective of research content, it mainly focuses on the specific content that an excellent teacher should have professional quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to other studies, some scholars also study the professional qualities of teachers of English, science, sports, history, mental health education, music, mathematics, history, information technology, and other disciplines in primary and secondary schools, as well as college English, sports, tourism management, mental health education, ideological and political, business English, and other professional teachers, such as Childs et al [7], Edwards et al [8], and Dong [9]. From the perspective of research, it is mainly from the perspective of pedagogy, and Keating et al [10] cut into the research of teachers' professional quality from the perspective of inclusive education concept and human resource management concept. From the perspective of research content, it mainly focuses on the specific content that an excellent teacher should have professional quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their TI is of concern because it has the potential to influence PPETs’ career choices as well as the quality of their teaching as in-service teachers. As widely known, it is difficult to recruit student teachers because of the busy schedule of their student teaching, job searching, thesis writing, and travel to multiple schools for data gathering ( Keating et al, 2021 ). The revalidation of PPET-TI-Chinese in PE student teachers provides us with a more effective tool to quantitatively examine TI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were from all Chinese provinces and autonomous cities except Taiwan. There were 70.2% of males and 29.8% of females, which is about the same as the population of PE teachers in China in which about two-thirds of the population are males (Keating et al, 2020 ). In addition, 511 (40.0%) and 715 (55.9%) were elementary and secondary PE teachers, respectively (Note: missing 4.1%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In alignment with the process outlined by Richards et al ( 2017 ) study on validating the PMQ-PE in the US, this investigation duplicated the validation process. An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was not obtained because it does not have such a requirement in China (Keating et al, 2020 ). However, the guidelines for human subject studies used in the US were closely followed to protect the privacy of participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%