1974
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1814:aaocdg>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Cloud Drop Growth by Collection: Part I. Double Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
3
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
112
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The size distribution in C5 (dashed line) is similar to the ones in C1 to C4 (grey lines). Numerical simulations of the onset of precipitation generally show that the collection process initially produces drizzle drops, which progressively grow to precipitation drops (Berry and Reinhardt, 1974). Our observations do not replicate the results of the simulations, suggesting that the early stage of drizzle drop formation probably occurred either lower or higher than the sampling level or that it was too fast for the series of cloud traverses to catch the transition.…”
Section: Drizzle and Precipitation Drop Distributionscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The size distribution in C5 (dashed line) is similar to the ones in C1 to C4 (grey lines). Numerical simulations of the onset of precipitation generally show that the collection process initially produces drizzle drops, which progressively grow to precipitation drops (Berry and Reinhardt, 1974). Our observations do not replicate the results of the simulations, suggesting that the early stage of drizzle drop formation probably occurred either lower or higher than the sampling level or that it was too fast for the series of cloud traverses to catch the transition.…”
Section: Drizzle and Precipitation Drop Distributionscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…We compare the results using the turbulent kernel to those using the Hall kernel. The plots naturally reveal the three growth phases first described qualitatively in Berry and Reinhardt (1974): (1) the autoconversion phase in which self-collections of small cloud droplets near the peak of the initial size distribution slowly shift the initial peak of the distribution toward larger sizes; (2) the accretion phase in which the accretion mode dominates over the autoconversion mode and serves to quickly transfer mass from the initial peak to the newly formed secondary peak at drizzle sizes; and (3) the large hydrometeor self-collection phase in which the self-collections of drizzle droplets move the second peak toward the raindrop sizes (a few millimeters). By examining the locations corresponding to the maximum and minimum ∂g/∂t, one can unambiguously identify the time intervals of the three phases (Xue et al, 2008).…”
Section: Several Important Observations Can Be Made Frommentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A small bin mass ratio of 2 0.25 ensures that the numerical solutions are free from numerical diffusion and dispersion errors. The mass distribution g(ln r, t) ≡ 3x 2 n(x , t) is usually plotted at different times in order to examine growth processes (Berry and Reinhardt, 1974). In Figure 4, we instead plot the local rate of change, ∂g/∂t, as a function of radius for times from 0 to 60 min every 1 min.…”
Section: Several Important Observations Can Be Made Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although various numerical methods are available to solve Eq. (7) directly (e.g., Berry and Reinhardt, 1974;Bott, 1998;Tzivion et al, 1999;Shima et al, 2009), this is most often seen as computationally too expensive in three-dimensional atmospheric models. Therefore bulk parameterizations are used which predict only a limited number of (partial) moments of the drop size distribution.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Turbulence Effects On Autoconversionmentioning
confidence: 99%