2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Riggs and Von Hippel (1994) showed that a majority of innovations in the scientific instruments industry came from lead users, whereas radical innovations in the biotechnology sector are mainly triggered by university research (Hall and Bagchi-Sen, 2007). Moreover, an empirical study in the telecommunication industry by Feller et al (2007) showed that incremental innovators collaborated with a wider and more internationalized range of external actors compared to radical innovators, whereas radical innovators that did collaborate partnered with actors who possessed less similar and complementary knowledge resources.…”
Section: Hypothesis 1 There Is An Inverted U-shaped Relationship Betmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riggs and Von Hippel (1994) showed that a majority of innovations in the scientific instruments industry came from lead users, whereas radical innovations in the biotechnology sector are mainly triggered by university research (Hall and Bagchi-Sen, 2007). Moreover, an empirical study in the telecommunication industry by Feller et al (2007) showed that incremental innovators collaborated with a wider and more internationalized range of external actors compared to radical innovators, whereas radical innovators that did collaborate partnered with actors who possessed less similar and complementary knowledge resources.…”
Section: Hypothesis 1 There Is An Inverted U-shaped Relationship Betmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research has tested how organizational learning capability affects product innovation performance (Alegre and Chiva, 2008) and, more generally, has investigated the numerous factors that influence innovative performance (Hall and Bagchi-Sen 2007). Schmidt and Rammer (2007) concentrated on the determinants of the various types of innovation and showed that they were very much identical with a significant rho between technological and non technological innovations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, beyond that limit technology diversity has a negative relationship with innovation. Innovation performance amongst firms with low R&D intensity is influenced more by production-based innovation factors and strategies that include gaining market access and maintaining customer connections (Hall & Bagchi-Sen, 2007). The more a firm engages with the market and transforms accordingly the more likely it will innovate (Liao & Rice, 2010).…”
Section: Firm-level Determinants Of Lt/lmt Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%