Astrodynamics Conference 1963
DOI: 10.2514/6.1963-404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Free-Flight Circumlunar Trajectories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Penzo [27] impelled the patched conic method further in both theory and computing techniques. He also proposed a free-return orbit design scheme, and determined the effect of the perilune distance and outward/return inclinations to the Moon's plane on the flight time [28]. It is concluded that the possible launch conditions would be constrained when the perilune distance, flight path, and landing location are fixed.…”
Section: Patched Conic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Penzo [27] impelled the patched conic method further in both theory and computing techniques. He also proposed a free-return orbit design scheme, and determined the effect of the perilune distance and outward/return inclinations to the Moon's plane on the flight time [28]. It is concluded that the possible launch conditions would be constrained when the perilune distance, flight path, and landing location are fixed.…”
Section: Patched Conic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5 shows a free-return orbit studied in [28]. It can be seen that the geocentric orbit is an ellipse orbit, and the selenocentric orbit is a hyperbolic one relative to the Moon.…”
Section: Patched Conic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reich suggested that the size of orbital launch window is a function of three general factors: the geometrical relationship between parking and lunar orbit planes, the amount of extra propellant allowed for the window, and the launch technique employed. Penzo (1963) considered the launch windows for free return circumlunar trajectories also from orbital launch. After Apollo 11, Berry's (1970) discussion of the mission's lunar trajectory profile and control included the determination of its launch window, stressing the influence by operational constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patched conic model first described and used by Egorov (1958) in 1956 is an analytical two-body approximation, and was also used by Penzo (1963) to outline schemes of free return generation. Schwaniger (1963) applied a CRTBM to numerically study the characteristics of two symmetric kinds of cislunar and circumlunar free returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the design of free returns started with a patched conic or circular restricted three-body problem approximation. The patched conic model first described and used by Egorov (1958) is an analytical two-body approximation, and was also used by Penzo (1963) to outline schemes of free return generation. Schwaniger (1963) applied a circular restricted three-body model to numerically study the characteristics of two symmetric kinds of cislunar and circumlunar free returns, based on the theorem of image trajectories in the Earth-Moon space developed by Miele (1960).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%