2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of genetic diversity in coconut (Cocos nucifera) populations from across the geographic range using sequence-tagged microsatellites (SSRs) and AFLPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
92
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
19
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Roa et al (2000) reported significant Mantel tests between AFLP and microsatellite genetic similarities calculated across seven species of the Manihot genus. Teulat et al (2000) and Pejic et al (1998) also reported congruent patterns of genetic distances between Cocos nucifera populations and maize inbred lines, respectively. As proposed by Powell et al (1996), the strength of the correlation between genetic distances calculated from AFLPs and microsatellites could increase when the among-taxa genetic divergences themselves increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Roa et al (2000) reported significant Mantel tests between AFLP and microsatellite genetic similarities calculated across seven species of the Manihot genus. Teulat et al (2000) and Pejic et al (1998) also reported congruent patterns of genetic distances between Cocos nucifera populations and maize inbred lines, respectively. As proposed by Powell et al (1996), the strength of the correlation between genetic distances calculated from AFLPs and microsatellites could increase when the among-taxa genetic divergences themselves increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This may be associated with the higher polymorphism of these markers. Previous studies have shown that at the lowest hierarchical level, microsatellites always displayed the lowest values of similarity when compared to other markers, reflecting their high information content (Russell et al, 1997, Pejic et al, 1998, Teulat et al, 2000. As a result, they appear less suitable for assigning individuals on this intermediate spatial scale, but microsatellites could be more efficient than AFLPs for investigating within-population structure and are widely preferred over AFLPs for fine-scale genetic studies (eg Streiff et al, 1998;Ueno et al, 2000;Bonnin et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More particularly, DNA profiling studies have already provided some insights. For example, Teulat et al (2000) found that the populations from Tonga and Fiji generally had distinct alleles from those of the rest of the South Pacific. They considered that the high levels of polymorphism revealed by the SSRs indicate that populations could be identified and information on allelic diversity obtained with relatively few loci.…”
Section: Molecular Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFLP (Restriction fragment length polymorphism) Lebrun et al 1998Lebrun et al , 1999Rohde et al1992 SSR (Simple sequence repeat or microsatellite DNA) Duran et al 1997;Karp 1999;Perera et al 1999Perera et al , 2000Rivera et al 1999;Teulat et al 2000 Mainly dominant markers detected RAPD (Random amplified polymorphic DNA) Anzizar et al 1998;Ashburner & Harries 1999;Ashburner & Rohde 1994;Ashburner et al 1997;Banks 1994;Cardeña et al 1999;Duran et al 1997;Rohde et al 1999;Upadhyay et al 2002;Wadt et al 1999 AFLP (Amplified fragment length polymorphism) Perera et al 1998;Rohde et al 1999;Teulat et al 2000 ISTR (Internal sequence tagged repeat) Anzizar et al 1998;Duran et al 1997;Rohde et al 1995Rohde et al , 1999 STS (Sequence tagged site amplification) Rohde et al 1999 and the Ancestry of Coconut Palm Populations on Pacific Islands.…”
Section: Codominant Markers Detectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation