2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Halva Price and Demand Dynamics by Granger Causality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inquiry was building the research-model base on the previous research and theoretical rooting of the Industrial theory and the quantitative method would conduct the descriptive analytic research design in management science, such as, figure 1, below (Dilek et al, 2016, Hult, 2011, Schultz and Block, 2015, Barger et al, 2016, Lütjen et al, 2017:…”
Section: Research Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inquiry was building the research-model base on the previous research and theoretical rooting of the Industrial theory and the quantitative method would conduct the descriptive analytic research design in management science, such as, figure 1, below (Dilek et al, 2016, Hult, 2011, Schultz and Block, 2015, Barger et al, 2016, Lütjen et al, 2017:…”
Section: Research Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Miao and Evans, 2013, Gelper et al, 2016, Zimmerhackel et al, 2018, Koo et al, 2017 The customer heterogeneity demand and demand un-certainty could anticipate within the focus-firms strategic with the consumer orientation and support from the upper echelons'. (Dilek et al, 2016, Adner and Levinthal, 2001, Nguyen, 2012, Formica and Uysal, 2016…”
Section: Cloth Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…m parameter is known as lag in equation (1) and magnitude of this value is determined by Akaike or Schwarz criteria. ADF test is set up by variable is not stationary null hypothesis ( ) and alternative hypothesis ( ) (Dilek et al, 2016). T shows number of observation in equation (2).…”
Section: Econometric Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%