2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2007.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of interdigitated electrode geometry for dielectrophoretic particle transport in micro-fluidics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (1996) compared the analytical solution from Green's Theorem based method with charge density method, whereas Green et al (2002) compared the analytical solution from Fourier series method with numerical solution solved by finite element method. Clague & Wheeler (2001), and Crews et al (2001) studied the effect of electrode dimensions, channel height and applied voltage on gradient of squared electric field. Molla & Bhattacharjee (2005a;b) compared the Green's theorem based analytical and finite element based numerical solutions as well as studied the effect of applied voltages and frequencies on DEP force.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wang et al (1996) compared the analytical solution from Green's Theorem based method with charge density method, whereas Green et al (2002) compared the analytical solution from Fourier series method with numerical solution solved by finite element method. Clague & Wheeler (2001), and Crews et al (2001) studied the effect of electrode dimensions, channel height and applied voltage on gradient of squared electric field. Molla & Bhattacharjee (2005a;b) compared the Green's theorem based analytical and finite element based numerical solutions as well as studied the effect of applied voltages and frequencies on DEP force.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20) with surface potential boundary conditions on electrode plane. Assuming the linear variation of surface potential at gap between the electrodes (Chang et al, 2003;Clague & Wheeler, 2001;Crews et al, 2001;Green et al, 2002;Molla & Bhattacharjee, 2005a;b;Morgan et al, 2001;Wang et al, 1996), the surface potential boundary conditions on electrodes and gap between electrodes are given as…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 The closed form solutions ͑CFSs͒ are also developed for electric field and DEP forces by Morgan et al 65 and Chang et al 66 Wang et al 60 compared the analytical solution from Green's theorem based method with charge density method, whereas Green et al 67 compared the analytical solution from the Fourier series method with numerical solution solved by finite element method. Clague and Wheeler 61 and Crew et al 68 studied the effect of electrode dimensions, channel height, and applied voltage on gradient of electric field square. Molla and Bhattacharjee 62,63 compared Green's theorem based analytical and finite element based numerical solutions, as well as studied the effect of applied voltages and frequencies on DEP force.…”
Section: Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13) where Ф is the electric potential and E denotes the electric field strength. the boundary conditions were selected as neumann and Dirichlet boundary condition according to their different functions in DeP operation (2). the electrode was trapezoid with top width 20 mm, bottom width 40 mm, and length 100 mm.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the traveling-wave dielectrophoresis devices were developed and used for transfer of polystyrene (3), blood cells (17), and whole blood (18) etc. At the same time, the transporting mechanism of particles in traveling-wave DeP and the effects of interdigitated electrode geometry on DeP transport were investigated to reveal the relation of particles motion and the applied signal (2,12). Furthermore, the moving dielectrophorsis has recently been introduced to transport cells in microfluid system, which allows cells to be fractionated as in conventional DeP but transported as in twDeP operation (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%