2020
DOI: 10.33122/ejeset.v1i1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of Pakistan’s National Curriculum of Mathematics at Secondary level

Abstract: The purpose of the study were to analyze the Curriculum document of National Curriculum of mathematics of secondary grades. The study employed qualitative research paradigm within it the discourse analysis technique was used to analyze the mathematics curriculum document. Discourse analysis helps in understanding the written, spoken and signs language used in any document analysis. The sample of the study were foreword, introduction, objectives, reviewer’s notes and list of reviewers, the sections of mathemati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also ensures that they are academically successful and that the knowledge they have acquired in this field is permanent (Kandemir, 2011;Sagirli, 2010;Samsuriadi, 2019). Although the curriculum (MoNE, 2017b) aims to gain many skills that are aimed to gain, mathematical modeling or modeling perspective is not given sufficient level in the curriculum (Bilen & Ciltas, 2015;Rind & Mughal, 2020). The reason for this is a separate research topic, but it may be related to the studies conducted in our country.The studies conducted in our country are limited to theoretical (Tekin Dede & Bukova Güzel, 2013or high school students (Hidiroglu, Tekin Dede, Kula, & Bukova Güzel, 2014;Sagirli, 2010) and teacher candidates (Altun, Memnun, & Yazgan, 2007;Deniz & Akgün, 2016;Kertil, 2008).…”
Section: Effective Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also ensures that they are academically successful and that the knowledge they have acquired in this field is permanent (Kandemir, 2011;Sagirli, 2010;Samsuriadi, 2019). Although the curriculum (MoNE, 2017b) aims to gain many skills that are aimed to gain, mathematical modeling or modeling perspective is not given sufficient level in the curriculum (Bilen & Ciltas, 2015;Rind & Mughal, 2020). The reason for this is a separate research topic, but it may be related to the studies conducted in our country.The studies conducted in our country are limited to theoretical (Tekin Dede & Bukova Güzel, 2013or high school students (Hidiroglu, Tekin Dede, Kula, & Bukova Güzel, 2014;Sagirli, 2010) and teacher candidates (Altun, Memnun, & Yazgan, 2007;Deniz & Akgün, 2016;Kertil, 2008).…”
Section: Effective Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maduabum & Odili (2006) indicated a low achievement in mathematics among students. Many other researchers like Elekwa (2010), Uwadiae (2010), Nufus (2020), Dahliana et al (2019), Nuraina (2018), Mursalin (2019), Usmadi (2020), Niswah (2020), Rind & Mughal (2020) and Olunloye (2010) variously indicated poor achievement in mathematics by students. This is a clear indication that students mathematics problem solving and learning ability is poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, it is a way to achieve the intended objectives. All the intended objectives are declared and should be achieved through the standard processes that are mentioned in the curriculum documents (Rind & Mughal, 2020).The two main requirements in the mathematics objectives are mathematical knowledge and conceptual understanding and both are important for further construction of math content (Salim & Gilar, 2020). The first one is relatively easy and not the real demand of mathematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%