Oceans 2010 MTS/Ieee Seattle 2010
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2010.5664076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of real-time terrain aided navigation results from a HUGIN AUV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A team at the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment carried out sea trials using TAN on an AUV with a multibeam and DVL. After 7 h of operation the team found that the navigation system was only 4 m out from a USBL system that was attached to a AUV and a research vessel that followed its movements [171]. These solutions can also be used in ROVs.…”
Section: Navigation and Positioning Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A team at the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment carried out sea trials using TAN on an AUV with a multibeam and DVL. After 7 h of operation the team found that the navigation system was only 4 m out from a USBL system that was attached to a AUV and a research vessel that followed its movements [171]. These solutions can also be used in ROVs.…”
Section: Navigation and Positioning Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more common that an a priori map is not available-either the mission is to explore a new area, or to measure and characterize changes in the terrain. In this case, the vehicle might generate incremental maps from sensor data on the fly (e.g., [10,36]) or use simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) techniques (e.g., [37][38][39]). …”
Section: Terrain-relative Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terrain may be characterized by sonar range measurements to the seafloor [10,32,33,36,[38][39][40][41] or photographs of the seafloor [42][43][44][45]. For some missions, AUVs have navigated relative to sonar maps of moving targets like icebergs [46,47].…”
Section: Terrain-relative Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from the Oslofjord 2010 [15] runs indicate that some tuning must be done to adapt the tests to other sensors. This tuning can be in the form of different rejection limits or some kind of scaling of the statistics depending on which sensor is used.…”
Section: Integrity Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%