1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Analysis of the Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Wave Propagation Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
112
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods include spectral and pseudospectral techniques (e.g., Carcione, 1994), which are characterized by high accuracy, or finite-element methods (FEMs), which have been successfully used for seismicwave simulations in 3D sedimentary basins because of their geometrical flexibility (e.g., Bao et al, 1998). The ADER-DG method (e.g., Arnold, 1982;Falk and Richter, 1999;Hu et al, 1999;Rivière and Wheeler, 2003;Monk and Richter, 2005;Käser and Dumbser, 2006) exploits the geometrical advantages offered by tetrahedral meshes and thus appears promising because of improved flexibility in the mesh creation step when compared to other high-order methods, while preserving comparable accuracy. However, from a computational perspective it is significantly more expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods include spectral and pseudospectral techniques (e.g., Carcione, 1994), which are characterized by high accuracy, or finite-element methods (FEMs), which have been successfully used for seismicwave simulations in 3D sedimentary basins because of their geometrical flexibility (e.g., Bao et al, 1998). The ADER-DG method (e.g., Arnold, 1982;Falk and Richter, 1999;Hu et al, 1999;Rivière and Wheeler, 2003;Monk and Richter, 2005;Käser and Dumbser, 2006) exploits the geometrical advantages offered by tetrahedral meshes and thus appears promising because of improved flexibility in the mesh creation step when compared to other high-order methods, while preserving comparable accuracy. However, from a computational perspective it is significantly more expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these preliminary papers we addressed some restricted inverse problems and dealt mainly with the computational challenges associated with poroelastic inverse problems. For the 25 forward model we used the SPECFEM2D code based on the spectral element method due to Morency and Tromp, [11]. However issues with the SPECFEM2D code (discussed later in the paper) led us to developing the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation discussed in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then the method has been extensively analysed [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Furthermore, the DG method and many variants have been applied to many problems, including first-and second-order hyperbolic problems such as Maxwell's equations and the elastic and acoustic wave equations [28,29,30, 31, 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,4,5,6,7 The spectral error for the semi-discrete scheme and h ! 0 is found to converge at h 2p+3 , for the absolute dispersion error, and h 2p+1 for the dissipation error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%