“…[47][48][49][50][51] The intensity of the first excitation is also in very good agreement with the experimentally derived one, 48 whereas the intensity of the 2 1 A 1 excitation is overestimated. In the chosen basis set, and as previously observed, 53,54 the first two core excitation energies are systematically overestimated at the CCSD level, respectively by 1.74 eV and 1.67 eV, compared to the experimental peak maxima. This results in a slightly smaller separation between the two computed XAS peaks (1.79 eV) than the separation between the experimental peaks (1.9 eV).…”