2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aiq.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of the performance of coupled cluster methods for K-edge core excitations and ionizations using standard basis sets

Abstract: An extensive analysis has been carried out of the performance of standard families of basis sets with the hierarchy of coupled cluster methods CC2, CCSD, CC3 and CCSDT in computing selected Oxygen, Carbon and Nitrogen K-edge (vertical) core excitation and ionization energies within a core-valence separated scheme in the molecules water, ammonia, and carbon monoxide. Complete basis set limits for the excitation energies have been estimated via different basis set extrapolation schemes. The importance of scalar … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
72
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
8
72
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[47][48][49][50][51] The intensity of the first excitation is also in very good agreement with the experimentally derived one, 48 whereas the intensity of the 2 1 A 1 excitation is overestimated. In the chosen basis set, and as previously observed, 53,54 the first two core excitation energies are systematically overestimated at the CCSD level, respectively by 1.74 eV and 1.67 eV, compared to the experimental peak maxima. This results in a slightly smaller separation between the two computed XAS peaks (1.79 eV) than the separation between the experimental peaks (1.9 eV).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…[47][48][49][50][51] The intensity of the first excitation is also in very good agreement with the experimentally derived one, 48 whereas the intensity of the 2 1 A 1 excitation is overestimated. In the chosen basis set, and as previously observed, 53,54 the first two core excitation energies are systematically overestimated at the CCSD level, respectively by 1.74 eV and 1.67 eV, compared to the experimental peak maxima. This results in a slightly smaller separation between the two computed XAS peaks (1.79 eV) than the separation between the experimental peaks (1.9 eV).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…[43][44][45][46][47] The intensity of the first excitation is also in very good agreement with the experimentally derived one, 44 whereas the intensity of the 2 1 A 1 excitation is overestimated. In the chosen basis set, and as previously observed, 49,50 the first two core excitation energies are systematically overestimated at the CCSD level, respectively by 1.74 eV and 1.67 eV, compared to the experimental peak maxima. This results in a slightly smaller separation between the two computed XAS peaks (1.79 eV) than the separation between the experimental peaks (1.9 eV).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set, but with reduced computational cost, both in coupled cluster 11,40 and algebraic diagrammatic construction 41,42 theory.…”
Section: Please Cite This Article As Doi:101063/15112164mentioning
confidence: 99%