An Analysis of the Structure and Evolution of the Distance Education Research Area Community in Terms of Coauthorships

Abstract

This article aims at characterizing the research community of Distance Education (DE) with respect to coauthorship, a special kind of collaboration among researchers, according to publications of 11 relevant DE journals. This article identified who the central researchers are, the topological properties of the coauthorship networks analyzed, the coauthorship patterns of each journal and the evolution of the DE community in the last 30 years. In order to achieve these goals, Social Network Analysis (SNA) was used, deriving centrality metrics, which depict the importance of researchers in the networks. This study found out that researchers who publish more papers are not necessarily the ones considered more central according to SNA. Besides, promising researchers, those linked to central researchers and are considered more likely to coauthor papers in the near future. Different coauthorship patterns among journals are described. Finally, a steep increase in the number of publications and coauthorships in the last decades was observed.

Measuring Participation in Distance Education Online Discussion Forums Using Social Network Analysis

“…Kinshuk, Sampson, and Chen () analyzed the research type, topics, and methods, international collaborations, participant levels, and frequently appearing keywords in the top‐20 highly cited articles in the Educational Technology and Society journal in the period between 2003 and 2010. Gomes and Barbosa () characterized the research community of DE with respect to coauthorship considering articles published in 11 relevant DE journals. The DE community has been characterized as under development, sparse, and poorly connected.…”

A Critical Appraisal of Review Studies in Circular Economy: a Tertiary Study

“…In order to answer RQ3, we have used citation counts obtained from Google Scholar. The analysis of citation counts is one of the most popular methods of research assessment [89]. In the case of tertiary studies, citation counts reveal the overall impact of the individual review studies, which might influence future researchers [23].…”