2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/naps.2016.7747977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model of a single phase DQ-controlled inverter for power system short circuit calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, traditional grid-following controls typically provide 2 p.u. or less of fault current in steady state, which is limited by the grid-following control scheme (Alvidrez et al 2016) and inverter hardware engineering (e.g., copper conductors, switches, thermal management system). This relative lack of fault current makes the detection and mitigation of fault events more challenging and more susceptible to unwanted tripping events, especially when backflow power is considered.…”
Section: Transition To Distribution Bidirectional Power Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, traditional grid-following controls typically provide 2 p.u. or less of fault current in steady state, which is limited by the grid-following control scheme (Alvidrez et al 2016) and inverter hardware engineering (e.g., copper conductors, switches, thermal management system). This relative lack of fault current makes the detection and mitigation of fault events more challenging and more susceptible to unwanted tripping events, especially when backflow power is considered.…”
Section: Transition To Distribution Bidirectional Power Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the literature has reported a number of studies that attempted to reflect the response of PV inverters during fault conditions with the aid of simulation models [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Authors in [6,7,8,9,10,11,12] presented detailed models emulating PV inverters under fault conditions, although the latter were not validated against hardware testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the literature has reported a number of studies that attempted to reflect the response of PV inverters during fault conditions with the aid of simulation models [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Authors in [6,7,8,9,10,11,12] presented detailed models emulating PV inverters under fault conditions, although the latter were not validated against hardware testing. The modeling work of [6] focuses on the initial fault response of inverter based generation, meaning the peak current during the subtransient period, neglecting the transient period and steadystate behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%