2014 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccs.2014.7024861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model on eavesdropping attacks in wireless networks

Abstract: Abstract-This paper concerns the eavesdropping problem from the eavesdroppers' perspective, which is new since most of previous studies only concentrate on the good nodes. We propose an analytical framework to investigate the eavesdropping attacks, taking account into various channel conditions and antenna models. Our extensive numerical results show that the probability of eavesdropping attacks heavily depends on the shadow fading effect, the path loss effect and the antenna models; particularly, they imply t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, little attention has been paid to investigating the eavesdropping behaviors conducted by the eavesdroppers in WNoT, which is nevertheless important for us to offer better protection on the confidential communications since we can design antieavesdropping schemes with clearer targets if we have a better knowledge on the eavesdroppers, although we conducted a preliminary study on the eavesdropping probability of wireless ad hoc networks in [46]. But this paper is significantly different from our previous work [46] in the following aspects: (1) we are concerned with the eavesdropping activities in WNoT in this paper while the previous paper investigated the eavesdropping attacks in wireless ad hoc networks; (2) we propose a novel analytical model on the eavesdropping probability in this paper, where the channel randomness (including Rayleigh fading effect and the shadowing effects) is considered while the previous paper only considered a simplified geometric model; (3) we conduct extensive simulations to verify the accuracy of our proposed model in this paper while the previous paper only presented the numerical results. (i) We formally establish an analytical framework to investigate the probability of eavesdropping attacks in WNoT with consideration of channel randomness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little attention has been paid to investigating the eavesdropping behaviors conducted by the eavesdroppers in WNoT, which is nevertheless important for us to offer better protection on the confidential communications since we can design antieavesdropping schemes with clearer targets if we have a better knowledge on the eavesdroppers, although we conducted a preliminary study on the eavesdropping probability of wireless ad hoc networks in [46]. But this paper is significantly different from our previous work [46] in the following aspects: (1) we are concerned with the eavesdropping activities in WNoT in this paper while the previous paper investigated the eavesdropping attacks in wireless ad hoc networks; (2) we propose a novel analytical model on the eavesdropping probability in this paper, where the channel randomness (including Rayleigh fading effect and the shadowing effects) is considered while the previous paper only considered a simplified geometric model; (3) we conduct extensive simulations to verify the accuracy of our proposed model in this paper while the previous paper only presented the numerical results. (i) We formally establish an analytical framework to investigate the probability of eavesdropping attacks in WNoT with consideration of channel randomness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study on investigating the eavesdropping attacks in UASNs. The previous analytical models on investigating the eavesdropping activities in terrestrial wireless sensor networks [ 30 , 35 ] can not be used to UASNs due to the different features of acoustic signals in underwater environments. For example, the path loss effect of an underwater acoustic channel depends on both the distance and the signal frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%