Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. ISCC 2003
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2003.1214248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical RED function design guaranteeing stable system behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if evidence has demonstrated the RED algorithm performs noticeably superior to the tail drop technique, studies have disclosed that RED has several disadvantages, such as Problems of parameterization (i.e., RED parameters must be continuously adjusted to get better performance), limited throughput, large delays, and the absence of a self-adaptation strategy (Patel, 2013;Misra et al, 2000;Plasser et al, 2010;and Floyd, 2000).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if evidence has demonstrated the RED algorithm performs noticeably superior to the tail drop technique, studies have disclosed that RED has several disadvantages, such as Problems of parameterization (i.e., RED parameters must be continuously adjusted to get better performance), limited throughput, large delays, and the absence of a self-adaptation strategy (Patel, 2013;Misra et al, 2000;Plasser et al, 2010;and Floyd, 2000).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Despite the fact that it has been demonstrated that the RED algorithm significantly outperforms the Tail Drop algorithm, research has shown that RED has some drawbacks, including parameterization issues (i.e., constant tuning of RED parameters is necessary to achieve an improved performance), low throughput, significant delays, and lack of a self-adaptation approach (Patel, S., 2013;Misra, V., et al, 2000;Plasser, E., et al, 2010 andFloyd, S., 2000). Floyd proposed Gentle RED (GRED) in (Floyd, S., 2000) to increase the throughput of RED.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current queue size q c is the most used indicator in AQM policy for estimating the probability of dropping the incoming packets. The drop probability p d can be calculated as (Plasser, Ziegler, & Reichl, 2002):…”
Section: A Effect Of Current Queue Size On Drop Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Adaptive RED algorithm, p d increases linearly between the two thresholds min th and max th in dependent on the average queue size "avg." Some studies (Ohsaki & Murata, 2004;Plasser et al, 2002) showed that using linear p d function can result in forced drops when q c exceeds max th or link under-utilization when q c decreases to zero. This is an evident that the original linear drop function does not perform well within a wide range of loads.…”
Section: Drop Probability Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%