1943
DOI: 10.1126/science.97.2506.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Apparatus for Determination of the Bacterial Content of Air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods generally used depend either on (I) filtration ( 63), (#) electrostatic sampling (9, 56), (3) bubbling through a liquid, (4) impingement (10, 77), ( 5) centrifugation (92), or (6) some combination of these methods (53,56,64). Filtration appears unsatisfactory, since recovery of viable vegetative organisms is poor (77).…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods generally used depend either on (I) filtration ( 63), (#) electrostatic sampling (9, 56), (3) bubbling through a liquid, (4) impingement (10, 77), ( 5) centrifugation (92), or (6) some combination of these methods (53,56,64). Filtration appears unsatisfactory, since recovery of viable vegetative organisms is poor (77).…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic sampling (9, 56) appears promising, but has not, as far as we know, been carefully compared with other methods. Application of other methods is such that collection is either directly on a solid culture medium (10,56) or into a liquid, from which aliquots are taken for culture (64,74,77), mixed with molten agar, and poured into plates. In either case, colonies are counted after an appropriate period of incubation at a temperature suitable for the organism studied.…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of the concentrations of air-borne bacteria, a number of air-sampling technics (based on two methods of collection) have generally been employed by various investigators. The first includes those devices which collect organisms in a liquid and break up any clumps of bacterial cells, such as the bubbler-pump method of Wheeler et al (1941) and the atomizer-bubbler apparatus of Moulton et al (1943). The second type of sampler impinges the bacteria directly onto a solid medium without attempting to break up clumps and is represented by the Wells' air centrifuge (1933), the funnel device of Hollaender and DallaValle (1939), the slit sampler developed by Bourdillon et al (1941), the sieve device of DuBuy and Crisp (1944) and, more recently, the application of the molecular filter membrane by Goetz (1953).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samplers with particular, although limited, merits have been reported. Examples are (a) sedimentation types: open Petri dish and Wells' air centrifuge (Wells, 1933); (b) filtration types: aeroscope (Rettger, 1910), sand tube (Anon, 1942), cotton filter (McConnell and Thomas, 1925), and molecular filter (Goetz, 1953); (c) air washing types: water aeroscope (Rettger, 1910), bead bubbler (Wheeler et al, 1941), atomizer bubbler (Moulton et al, 1943), and Folin-Lemon bubbler (Lemon, 1943); (d) agar impingement types: funnel device (Hollaender and DallaValle, 1939), slit type (Bourdillon et al, 1941), and sieve device (duBuy and Crisp, 1944); (e) electrostatic deposition types: Berry M. E. TYLER AND E. L. SHIPE funnel precipitator (Berry, 1944) and the electrostatic precipitator (Luckiesh et al, 1946a, b). An impingement device with some new features has recently been described (Anderson, 1958).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%