2014
DOI: 10.5267/j.uscm.2014.7.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of extended elitist non-dominated sorting Genetic Algorithm in multi-objective linear programming problem of tea industry with interval objectives

Abstract: In this paper, we have modeled a decision making problem of a tea industry as a multi-objective optimization problem in interval environment. The goal of this problem is to maximize the overall profit as well as to minimize the total production cost subject to the given resource constraints depending on budget, storage space and allotted processing times in different machines. For this purpose, the problem has been formulated as a multi-objective integer linear programming problem with interval objectives. To … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, GeNePi applies NSGA [8]: a genetic algorithm which in addition to coping with interval objectives distinguishes itself by (i) selecting and making a tournament between four parents before mixing the winners (using different operators: crossover and mutation) and (ii) mixing the offspring population (i.e., population resulting from an evolution) with the original one, thus only keeping the elite solutions for a faster convergence towards the optimal Pareto front. In our algorithm, we use One-point and Two-point 'cuts' as crossovers where random cut positions are selected in the parents' chromosomes and their respective parts exchanged.…”
Section: Reassignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, GeNePi applies NSGA [8]: a genetic algorithm which in addition to coping with interval objectives distinguishes itself by (i) selecting and making a tournament between four parents before mixing the winners (using different operators: crossover and mutation) and (ii) mixing the offspring population (i.e., population resulting from an evolution) with the original one, thus only keeping the elite solutions for a faster convergence towards the optimal Pareto front. In our algorithm, we use One-point and Two-point 'cuts' as crossovers where random cut positions are selected in the parents' chromosomes and their respective parts exchanged.…”
Section: Reassignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%