2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ieem.2007.4419517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of the relevance matrix methodology in occupational risk evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the primitive perception of risk came its understanding from its understanding comes its management. Workplace risks and hazards are, most of all, related to health and safety [5]. The Health and Safety Risk Management Process uses several methodologies and a huge number of applicable tools.…”
Section: Health and Safety Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the primitive perception of risk came its understanding from its understanding comes its management. Workplace risks and hazards are, most of all, related to health and safety [5]. The Health and Safety Risk Management Process uses several methodologies and a huge number of applicable tools.…”
Section: Health and Safety Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples demonstrate how one can apply the Hazard Matrix to prioritize the risk management strategies and how investments in safety and health at work will be ranked in order to maximize the return of investment and [5], [10] the Hazard Matrix had been constructed as TABLES VI and VII shows. Risk evaluation is based in qualitative methods, ambient conditions analysis (of all the sectors of the industry), the existing Risk Mapping [11] and interviews with the workers.…”
Section: Risk Evaluation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table III in the same way as done for the frequency. The last column i [9].The resulted risk is determined by match both frequency and consequence categories in the decision matrix presented in Figure 3 [10]. The interpretation of this risk level is presented in Table IV.…”
Section: Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%