1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80245-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An appraisal of CT pulmonary density mapping in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While, compared to Haraldsson et al study (9) , the gel density and CT number were decreased signi2icantly with addition of more polystyrene spheres, still they were higher than the corresponding values for normal human lung tissue, which ranges from −770 to −875 Houns2ield units (12) . The gel density could potentially be further lowered by adding of smaller polystyrene spheres.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…While, compared to Haraldsson et al study (9) , the gel density and CT number were decreased signi2icantly with addition of more polystyrene spheres, still they were higher than the corresponding values for normal human lung tissue, which ranges from −770 to −875 Houns2ield units (12) . The gel density could potentially be further lowered by adding of smaller polystyrene spheres.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…However, this type of system tends to be labourious and time consuming. Automated objective techniques such as density thresholding [111,112] are critically dependent upon a clear dichotomy between normal and reduced lung density; while such a difference exists in emphysema, in constrictive bronchiolitis, particularly when admixed with interstitial disease, lung density representing disease is highly heterogeneous and automation of density scoring in this context has proved elusive. Thus, subjective visual scoring systems, sometimes semi-automated, are often favoured for quantitative studies of small airways disease.…”
Section: Morphological-functional Correlations In Constrictive Bronchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to being evaluated visually, emphysematous changes on CT can be quantified objectively by measuring lung attenuation [11,12]. Lung attenuation values in normal subjects range from -770--875 Hounsfield units (HU) [13]. The density in emphysematous lung is low, and voxels with low attenuation values can be highlighted by the use of "density mask" software [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%