2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for efficient open vocabulary spoken term detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While detection performance reported in [9] for IV queries was quite good, it was found that there was still a significant gap between the detection performance obtained for IV and OOV terms. The techniques presented in Section 2 significantly reduce this performance gap by using a more powerful strategy for verifying OOV term occurrences from lattice paths retrieved from the hybrid index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While detection performance reported in [9] for IV queries was quite good, it was found that there was still a significant gap between the detection performance obtained for IV and OOV terms. The techniques presented in Section 2 significantly reduce this performance gap by using a more powerful strategy for verifying OOV term occurrences from lattice paths retrieved from the hybrid index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Once the likelihoods of the paths containing the index term are scaled, all the paths of lj are re-ranked and then if the highest ranking path contains Vi that path is added to the index for Vi. The motivation and a detailed description of this indexing method can be found in [9].…”
Section: Offline -Building An Index Of Lattice Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common approaches rely on lattices generated by a large vocabulary continuous speech recognition (LVCSR) system [1,2,3,4,5]. In addition, there are many alternative STD approaches in use that require fewer linguistic resources than those required by LVCSR systems [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%