2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-01954-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach for tool wear prediction using customized DenseNet and GRU integrated model based on multi-sensor feature fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, figures 6(d)-(f) Furthermore, to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method, we conduct comparative experiments with six advanced prediction methods in the field. These methods include DBN [43], TDConvLSTM [44], TBNN [28], CTNN [45], HACDNet-GRU [30], and TCNA [33]. They utilize various modules such as LSTM, TCN, attention mechanisms, and GRU, and have achieved accurate prediction accuracy in tool wear domain.…”
Section: Results Of Phm2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, figures 6(d)-(f) Furthermore, to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method, we conduct comparative experiments with six advanced prediction methods in the field. These methods include DBN [43], TDConvLSTM [44], TBNN [28], CTNN [45], HACDNet-GRU [30], and TCNA [33]. They utilize various modules such as LSTM, TCN, attention mechanisms, and GRU, and have achieved accurate prediction accuracy in tool wear domain.…”
Section: Results Of Phm2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the gated recurrent unit (GRU) with two-gate structure, which has the advantages of simple structure and fast training speed, has emerged and been used to extract deeper temporal features [29]. Liu et al [30] built a depth-gated recurrent unit for extracting time-series features hidden in sequences. After that, temporal convolutional network (TCN) is an algorithm for extracting temporal features in parallel, which has the advantage of fast computation with little training difficulty and better performance than RNN and LSTM [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al [41] used stacked sparse autoencoders to improve tool wear prediction performance. Liu et al [42] and Xu et al [43] developed [60]. Another is that testing samples obey the same data distribution as training samples [61].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [19] extracted local features using parallel Residual Network (ResNet) and then utilized a stacked bidirectional LSTM network to extract time-series features for predicting tool wear. Liu et al [20] extracted local features from multi-sensor signals using the improved DenseNet algorithm, followed by temporal feature extraction with the GRU algorithm, employing two deep learning models for tool wear prediction. Cheng et al [21] monitored tool status by combining parallel CNN and bidirectional LSTM models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%