2023
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v13i5.pp5282-5295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach of ontology and knowledge base for railway maintenance

Abstract: <p>Maintenance methods have become automated and innovative, especially with the transition to maintenance 4.0. However, social issues such as coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) and the war in Ukraine have caused significant departures of maintenance experts, resulting in the loss of enormous know-how. As part of this work, we will propose a solution by exploring the knowledge and expertise of these experts for the purpose of sharing and conservation. In this perspective, we have built a knowledge ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, tacit knowledge whose first source is an experience [5] and is generally difficult to share [4]. In this sense, in previous work [6] we have proposed a complete process based on the socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI) method for the optimal collection of explicit and tacit knowledge from each technician [7]. This knowledge base has been formalized by two ontologies, the 1st for rolling stock and the 2 nd for failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, tacit knowledge whose first source is an experience [5] and is generally difficult to share [4]. In this sense, in previous work [6] we have proposed a complete process based on the socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI) method for the optimal collection of explicit and tacit knowledge from each technician [7]. This knowledge base has been formalized by two ontologies, the 1st for rolling stock and the 2 nd for failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%