2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-016-0366-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to 2D Signals Recovering in Compressive Sensing Context

Abstract: In this paper we study the compressive sensing effects on 2D signals exhibiting sparsity in 2D DFT domain. A simple algorithm for reconstruction of randomly under-sampled data is proposed. It is based on the analytically determined threshold that precisely separates signal and non-signal components in the 2D DFT domain. The algorithm operates fast in a single iteration providing the accurate signal reconstruction. In the situations that are not comprised by the analytic derivation and constrains, the algorithm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the sensed signals are measured by Gaussian random matrices Φ j ∈ R M x ×400 in each time instant τ = 31 s, and the sink received the measured signals. The simulation results are reported from the obtained mean results of 100 frames with different x j s. The performance of the proposed reconstruction algorithm is compared with gradient-CS [11], SFAR-2D [12], reweightedlaplace [13], sequential-CS [20], modified-CS [29] and regularized modified-BPDN [30]. During the simulation, several parameters of the algorithms have been carefully tuned to perform an impartial comparison between the algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, the sensed signals are measured by Gaussian random matrices Φ j ∈ R M x ×400 in each time instant τ = 31 s, and the sink received the measured signals. The simulation results are reported from the obtained mean results of 100 frames with different x j s. The performance of the proposed reconstruction algorithm is compared with gradient-CS [11], SFAR-2D [12], reweightedlaplace [13], sequential-CS [20], modified-CS [29] and regularized modified-BPDN [30]. During the simulation, several parameters of the algorithms have been carefully tuned to perform an impartial comparison between the algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And as the number of measurements increases, the performance of the methods gradually approaches that of the proposed algorithm. The reconstruction times versus different measurement numbers for gradient-CS [11], SFAR-2D [12], reweighted-laplace [13], sequential-CS [20], modified-CS [29], regularized modified-BPDN [30] and the proposed algorithm is depicted in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to effectively explain the proposed algorithm superiority, standard OMP and SP are presented at the same time. Gradient algorithm for ISAR proposed in [18] and a new 2D signals recovering algorithm proposed in [19] are presented at the same time to compare with the TMP algorithm. From Fig.…”
Section: Tmp Algorithm Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ℑ ℑ ℑ ℑ denotes 2D DFT matrix obtained as a Kronecker product of two I×J DFT matrices: Reconstruction of 2D signals -SFAR 2D [96]). The algorithm is tested on the simulated radar signal.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%