2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Neuroimaging Interpersonal Interactions in Mental Health Interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings support the notion that deficits in social coordination could serve as an early indicator of SCZ 22,5255 . Identifying such markers could facilitate earlier diagnosis and open up new avenues for treatment interventions, such as interpersonal psychotherapy 56 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings support the notion that deficits in social coordination could serve as an early indicator of SCZ 22,5255 . Identifying such markers could facilitate earlier diagnosis and open up new avenues for treatment interventions, such as interpersonal psychotherapy 56 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new paradigm, hyperscanning realizes the conversion of traditional “one‐person” approach to “two or more person” approach and the transformation from brain–computer interaction to brain–brain coupling, which greatly enhanced the research on inter‐personal brain mechanism (Gvirts & Perlmutter, 2020 ; Schilbach et al, 2013 ). Recently, using hyperscanning techniques to reveal the influence of patient–doctor interaction on clinical outcomes attracts growing attention (Anzolin et al, 2020 ; Crum et al, 2022 ; Ellingsen et al, 2020 ; Ellingsen et al, 2022 ). For example, an fNIRS hyperscanning study reported that INS in the PFC of patient–doctor pair was significantly greater during clinical interactions compared to everyday‐life communication (Crum et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, using hyperscanning techniques to reveal the influence of patient–doctor interaction on clinical outcomes attracts growing attention (Anzolin et al, 2020 ; Crum et al, 2022 ; Ellingsen et al, 2020 ; Ellingsen et al, 2022 ). For example, an fNIRS hyperscanning study reported that INS in the PFC of patient–doctor pair was significantly greater during clinical interactions compared to everyday‐life communication (Crum et al, 2022 ). INS is often observed between two or more brains during social interactions, which has been described as a mechanism of shared intentionality (Fishburn et al, 2018 ) that facilitates more attunement and greater allocation of attention to the interaction (Gvirts & Perlmutter, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation