2007
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncm410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An approach to reduction of uncertainties in internal doses reconstructed for the Techa river population

Abstract: A methodology was developed for reduction of uncertainties in estimates of internal dose for residents of the Techa Riverside communities, who were exposed as a result of releases of radionuclides from the Mayak plutonium production facility in 1949-56. The 'Techa River Dosimetry System' (TRDS) was specifically elaborated for reconstruction of doses. A preliminary analysis of uncertainty for doses estimated using the current version of the TRDS showed large ranges in the uncertainty of internal absorbed dose a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dose-reconstruction process is extensively based on the results of postmortem measurements of 90 Sr concentration in bone samples obtained in 1951-1993, the results of in vivo measurements of surface-beta activity of teeth using tooth-beta counters , and on measurements of 137 Cs and 90 Sr body burden in a whole body counter . Mean cumulative RBM dose in 1956 was 333.6 ± 4.6 mGy (SD = 259.9 mGy, max = 1151 mGy) (Napier et al 2001;Degteva et al 2006Degteva et al , 2007. The internal exposure was a determinative factor for about 80% of the riverside population (lower and middle reaches of the Techa).…”
Section: Description Of Population and Clinical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dose-reconstruction process is extensively based on the results of postmortem measurements of 90 Sr concentration in bone samples obtained in 1951-1993, the results of in vivo measurements of surface-beta activity of teeth using tooth-beta counters , and on measurements of 137 Cs and 90 Sr body burden in a whole body counter . Mean cumulative RBM dose in 1956 was 333.6 ± 4.6 mGy (SD = 259.9 mGy, max = 1151 mGy) (Napier et al 2001;Degteva et al 2006Degteva et al , 2007. The internal exposure was a determinative factor for about 80% of the riverside population (lower and middle reaches of the Techa).…”
Section: Description Of Population and Clinical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The internal exposure was a determinative factor for about 80% of the riverside population (lower and middle reaches of the Techa). The residents of the upper reaches were exposed both internally and externally, and the levels of each type of exposure were comparable (Degteva et al 2007;Anspaugh et al 2006).…”
Section: Description Of Population and Clinical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent improvements are described in (Shagina et al , 2003; Degteva et al , 2007, 2009; Tolstykh et al , 2011; Degteva et al , 2012; Shagina et al , 2012a, 2012b). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty in each parameter can be described by a standard statistical distribution. Further, more detailed analysis of uncertainty in the doses being calculated for the TRDS is the subject of continuing work; some approaches were described in Degteva et al (2007).…”
Section: Approaches To Evaluation Of Uncertainties In the Reference 9mentioning
confidence: 99%