The Handbook of Historical Linguistics 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Semantic Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Semantic drift–or its alternative labelling as change, progression, shift or development–has had multidisciplinary treatments from: sociology and anthropology looking at how language is used in society and different cultures and observing dynamic change [ 25 ]; psychology where word associations are measured for change over time or how bias is built into cognitive structures for interpreting contexts [ 26 ]; computer science where machine learning can be used to measure or predict changes in word meaning and usage or even patterns of change measured over time [ 27 ]; then in linguistics scholars have looked at the social factors of language and cultural norms, identity and how different social groups influence semantic change. This can be observed through historical frames by looking at the evolution of language over time [ 28 ] and then the changing use of general language through lexicography, sometimes evidenced through dictionary analysis and definitions [ 29 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic drift–or its alternative labelling as change, progression, shift or development–has had multidisciplinary treatments from: sociology and anthropology looking at how language is used in society and different cultures and observing dynamic change [ 25 ]; psychology where word associations are measured for change over time or how bias is built into cognitive structures for interpreting contexts [ 26 ]; computer science where machine learning can be used to measure or predict changes in word meaning and usage or even patterns of change measured over time [ 27 ]; then in linguistics scholars have looked at the social factors of language and cultural norms, identity and how different social groups influence semantic change. This can be observed through historical frames by looking at the evolution of language over time [ 28 ] and then the changing use of general language through lexicography, sometimes evidenced through dictionary analysis and definitions [ 29 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyen & Aberle 1974, Blust 1987, Fortson 2003, Zorc 2004, Fox 2005, Urban 2011. Within grammaticalization studies the focus has mostly been on internal semantic reconstruction (cf.…”
Section: Reconstructing Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Prayers were, as now, often recited while being counted on rosary beads, and a phrase like to count (or tell ) one’s beads had at least two possible interpretations for someone who did not already know what was meant by bead : it could conceivably refer to the prayers that were being counted, or the beads (in the modern sense) that were being used for the counting. Some speakers apparently interpreted the meaning of bead as ‘perforated ball on a string’ (Fortson, 2003, p. 651).
…”
Section: Communitarianism and Descriptive Linguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A language learner obviously cannot reach directly into other speakers’ heads to learn what they mean by a word. As a result, ‘[a]ny speaker without direct access to the intentions of the speakers around him or her must figure out what words mean from the contexts in which he or she encounters them’ (Fortson, 2003, p. 648). When the context is ambiguous, language learners or interpreters may form a theory of the meaning of a word, expression, etc.…”
Section: Underdetermination Theory‐building and Sociolinguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%