2005
DOI: 10.1007/11540007_142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Approach to Web Service Discovery Based on the Semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their method uses an algorithm using extended semantic annotation, based on web service standards. The critical problems in web service discovery such as how to locate web services and how to select the best one from large numbers of functionally similar web services are explained by Fan, Ren, and Xiong (). Küster and König‐Ries () propose a graded relevance scale for semantic web services matchmaking as measurements to evaluate SWS matchmakers based on such graded relevance scales.…”
Section: Related Work On Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method uses an algorithm using extended semantic annotation, based on web service standards. The critical problems in web service discovery such as how to locate web services and how to select the best one from large numbers of functionally similar web services are explained by Fan, Ren, and Xiong (). Küster and König‐Ries () propose a graded relevance scale for semantic web services matchmaking as measurements to evaluate SWS matchmakers based on such graded relevance scales.…”
Section: Related Work On Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the matching degree, they use various methods and focus on different elements of the services descriptions besides taking into account their semantics. They essentially opt for three types of matching: IO-matching (Inputs and Outputs matching) [19][20], PE-matching (Preconditions and Effects matching) [4] and IOPE-matching (Inputs, Outputs, Preconditions and Effects matching) [21][22][23] [24]. In IO-matching, matched elements are limited to inputs and outputs.…”
Section: Deductive Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It concerns data semantics of input (I) and output (O) service parameters. This type of matching is adopted in [7], [8], and [9]. • PE-matching: this category concerns the matching of service/request preconditions (P) and effects (E).…”
Section: A Logic-based Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Compared to [12], [11], [17], [9] and [8] in which the matching is mainly based on inputs and/or outputs, we distinguish Matching Degrees for inputs, outputs, operation, and interface. For example, if one requires a service providing some inputs/outputs within specific interface's goals and/or some operations' capabilities, it is obvious that semantic matching results would be more satisfying and precise than matching all services basically through required inputs/outputs, either syntactically or even semantically like in [11] and [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation