An Architecture for Fully Reconfigurable Plug-and-Play Wireless Sensor Network Testbed

Bekan, Adnan; Mohorčič, Mihael; Činkelj, Justin; Fortuna, Carolina

doi:10.1109/glocom.2015.7417564

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An unusual outlier is another testbed facility using RESTful API as a user interface. It is the architecture proposed by Fully reconfigurable plug-and-play wireless sensor network testbed by Bekan et al [38]. The RESTful API is used in a proof of concept reference implementation with the idea that when the proposed architecture is implemented into a fully-fledged testbed facility, the approach for the user interface is improved.…”

Section: User Interfacementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two distinct outliers who use low-rate wireless personal area network IEEE 802.15.4 for the connection interface for the DUT are the flexible and low-cost testbed facility FIST by Guo et al [26] and a Fully reconfigurable plug-and-play wireless sensor network testbed by Bekan et al [38]. They both are providing a wireless management channel, although each is using a somewhat different approach, as the first one is using two MAC stacks on top of the same physical layer and the second one is using two radio modules on the same sensor node.…”

Section: Dut Connection Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Testbed Facilities for IoT and Wireless Sensor Networks: A Systematic Review

Judvaitis

Abolins

Elkenawy

et al. 2023

JSAN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the popularity and complexity of WSN devices and IoT systems are increasing, the testing facilities should keep up. Yet, there is no comprehensive overview of the landscape of the testbed facilities conducted in a systematic manner. In this article, we provide a systematic review of the availability and usage of testbed facilities published in scientific literature between 2011 and 2021, including 359 articles about testbeds and identifying 32 testbed facilities. The results of the review revealed what testbed facilities are available and identified several challenges and limitations in the use of the testbed facilities, including a lack of supportive materials and limited focus on debugging capabilities. The main contribution of this article is the description of how different metrics impact the uasge of testbed facilities, the review also highlights the importance of continued research and development in this field to ensure that testbed facilities continue to meet the changing needs of the ever-evolving IoT and WSN domains.

show abstract

Section: User Interfacementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Dut Connection Interfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%