2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Bloodstream Infections Prediction

Abstract: This study aimed to develop an early prediction model for identifying patients with bloodstream infections. The data resource was taken from 2015 to 2019 at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, and a total of 1647 bloodstream infection episodes and 3552 non-bloodstream infection episodes in the intensive care unit (ICU) were included in the model development and evaluation. During the data analysis, 30 clinical variables were selected, including patients’ basic characteristics, vital signs, laboratory data, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, recall rate, specificity, and Brier score were the main evaluation metrics used to evaluate and compare the model performances. However, the higher the value of AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, specificity, and recall rate, the better the model performances, but the Brier score was just the opposite [ 18 ]. In both the training and test sets, the XGBoost model showed the highest values regarding AUC, F1-score, accuracy, and recall rate, and the lowest values regarding Brier score (AUC = 0.791 (95% CI: 0.776–0.806) and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.818–0.843), F1-score = 0.663 and 0.706, accuracy = 0.739 and 0.770, recall rate = 0.638 and 0.677, Brier score = 0.165 and 0.153) (Figures 4(a) , 4(b) , 5(a), and 5(b) Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, recall rate, specificity, and Brier score were the main evaluation metrics used to evaluate and compare the model performances. However, the higher the value of AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, specificity, and recall rate, the better the model performances, but the Brier score was just the opposite [ 18 ]. In both the training and test sets, the XGBoost model showed the highest values regarding AUC, F1-score, accuracy, and recall rate, and the lowest values regarding Brier score (AUC = 0.791 (95% CI: 0.776–0.806) and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.818–0.843), F1-score = 0.663 and 0.706, accuracy = 0.739 and 0.770, recall rate = 0.638 and 0.677, Brier score = 0.165 and 0.153) (Figures 4(a) , 4(b) , 5(a), and 5(b) Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, recall rate, specifcity, and Brier score were the main evaluation metrics used to evaluate and compare the model performances. However, the higher the value of AUC, F1-score, accuracy, precision, specifcity, and recall rate, the better the model performances, but the Brier score was just the opposite [18]. S4 and S5.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further, SVM (0.578 and 0.566), RF (0.565 and 0.577), and MLP (0.494 and 0.406) models exhibited lower sensitivity. The validation was conducted with the important risk factors associated with BSI, such as prothrombin time (PT), platelets (PLT), and albumin (ALB), which are key factors [ 89 ]. Similarly, Zoabi et al, developed a patient outcome of BSI model to identify BSI patient risk based on the electronic medical records (EMR) of only bacteria-based positive blood culture results, with the goal of identifying risky patients, initiating a planned treatment with appropriate antibiotics, and transferring them to the ICU.…”
Section: Omicronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BSIs are considered one of the most important infections with an overall mortality rate of 15-30% [77]. In this case, biofilms are involved in catheter-associated BSIs.…”
Section: Bloodstream Infections (Bsis)mentioning
confidence: 99%