2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000jd000152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of hygroscopic growth factors for aerosols in the surface boundary layer for computing direct radiative forcing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the optical attenuation method has shown excellent agreement with other analytic methods (Allen et al, 1999;Im et al, 2001) and has been widely used Beegum et al, 2009;Babu et al, 2011), there are several reports available in recent literature on the uncertainties related to the estimation of EBC by aethelometer (e.g., Weingartner et al, 2003;Arnott et al, 2005;Corrigan et al, 2006). From different literature, it is clear that all the available methods for measurement of EBC mass concentration are based on some assumptions that are instrument specific, site specific and also depends on the type of carbonaceous aerosol, and its fraction to the total aerosol mass (Weingartner et al, 2003;Hitzenberger et al, 2006;Moorthy et al, 2007;Nair et al, 2007).…”
Section: Instrumentation (Measurement Data)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Though the optical attenuation method has shown excellent agreement with other analytic methods (Allen et al, 1999;Im et al, 2001) and has been widely used Beegum et al, 2009;Babu et al, 2011), there are several reports available in recent literature on the uncertainties related to the estimation of EBC by aethelometer (e.g., Weingartner et al, 2003;Arnott et al, 2005;Corrigan et al, 2006). From different literature, it is clear that all the available methods for measurement of EBC mass concentration are based on some assumptions that are instrument specific, site specific and also depends on the type of carbonaceous aerosol, and its fraction to the total aerosol mass (Weingartner et al, 2003;Hitzenberger et al, 2006;Moorthy et al, 2007;Nair et al, 2007).…”
Section: Instrumentation (Measurement Data)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The correlation between extinction coefficient ka and PM10 is also affected by the chemical components of particles and relative humidity of the air, since the PM10 concentrations measured by the instruments are almost the dry mass of the particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 μm. Thus, f (RH) is used to define the hygroscopic growing factor as [36,45]:…”
Section: Jan 5 Janmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows an example of this feature. Hygroscopic growth of aerosols and the consequent effects on aerosol light scattering can be assumed to be essentially negligible under such dry conditions (Nemesure et al, 1995;Baumgardner and Clarke, 1998;Im et al, 2001;Redemann et al, 2001;Carrico et al, 2003;Markowicz et al, 2003). Thus, the optical properties of aerosols measured near the surface are likely to be similar to those aloft in a well-mixed boundary layer, which is advantageous for some radiative closure analyses.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%