In the review by Tonnis et al., 'Devices and formulations for pulmonary vaccination' [1], a major class of nebulizers was overlooked----namely, mesh nebulizers. As illustrated below, mesh nebulizers overcome many of the problems that were highlighted for jet and ultrasonic variants and would, in our opinion, be the nebulizer type of choice when considering the delivery of vaccines and other macromolecules to the respiratory tract.Mesh nebulizers generate aerosol by passing the formulation through an ultrasonically vibrating mesh, containing holes approximately 2.5 µm in diameter, which results in aerosol with a median droplet size of approximately 4 µm. Mesh nebulizers fall into two categories. The first are those that have a piezoceramic element directly bonded to the mesh, causing it to vibrate (e.g., the PARI eFlow, PARI GmbH, Starnberg, Germany, and the Aeroneb Go, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland). The second are those that have a piezoceramic element bonded to a horn, which then vibrates and pulses fluid through a static mesh (e.g., the I-neb AAD System, Respironics Respiratory Drug Delivery (UK) Ltd, Chichester, UK, and the MicroAir U22, OMRON Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan). These mesh nebulizers are small, light (<200 g), portable, and do not require an AC power source; they also offer fast nebulization times, have low residual volumes, and do not require a pressurized external air source. Thus, they overcome many of the factors that were identified in the paper as making nebulization unsuitable for vaccine delivery. Mesh nebulizers are described and discussed more fully in papers by Kisser et al. and Hardaker et al. [2,3].The review also highlighted that degradation of a vaccine can occur, either due to shear forces in the jet nebulizers, or due to ultrasonic pulsing (plus heating) in the ultrasonic nebulizers. Due to the recirculation of droplets in the jet and ultrasonic nebulizers, a labile molecule can be subjected to these shear forces a number of times before it leaves the nebulizer. Mesh nebulizers, by contrast, have no recirculation, and pass the labile molecule only once through the aerosol generation mesh; the passage through the mesh itself is subject to low shear. This makes mesh nebulizers ideally suited to delivery of labile molecules, and successful delivery, without loss of activity, has been demonstrated with a range of macromolecules and biological materials [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10].Another feature of nebulizers raised in the Tonnis et al. review, which limited their use for vaccine delivery, was inaccuracy of dose. This can be overcome by breath activation, implementation of volumetric metering, and use of controlled breathing patterns; these features are found in the I-neb nebulizer and can result in lung deliveries of over 70% of the total inhaled drug [11]. Although cost could be an issue with single-patient use devices, the relatively simple design of the mesh nebulizer, and advances in materials, provide for the possibility of multi-patient mesh nebulizers, enabling multiple doses to be deli...