2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of OpenFOAM solver on RANS simulations of round supersonic free jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the present baseline supersonic jet configuration, Wu and New [20] observed that perfect jet expansion occurs at NPR=3.4. Lastly, while the initial baseline nozzle wall boundary layer was not measured during the study, simulations conducted by Zang et al [23] on the same nozzle, jet apparatus and flow condition at NPR=4 indicated that they are most likely to be turbulent here.…”
Section: Jet Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the present baseline supersonic jet configuration, Wu and New [20] observed that perfect jet expansion occurs at NPR=3.4. Lastly, while the initial baseline nozzle wall boundary layer was not measured during the study, simulations conducted by Zang et al [23] on the same nozzle, jet apparatus and flow condition at NPR=4 indicated that they are most likely to be turbulent here.…”
Section: Jet Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Apparently, the parameter β is insufficient to evaluate shock strengths when the shock structures are altered by asymmetric nozzle geometries (such as the stepped nozzles used here). Furthermore, quantitative information on shock strengths obtained through experimental measurements are rather limited, and this lack of quantitative experimental data has compelled many studies to compare between numerical simulation results to qualitative schlieren visualization [20,23,44]. One of the reasons for the lack of experimental data on shock strengths is due to the limitations of conventional experimental techniques.…”
Section: Quantitative Calibrated Schlierenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first method, the Navier-Stokes equations are averaged according to Reynolds (in compressible flows, according to Favre). The advantages are mean requirements for the computing resources (including due to the possibility of obtaining a solution in twodimensional plane or axisymmetric formulations) and the solution satisfactory accuracy in the region of the first jet "barrel" [12,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Numerical Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh refinement was applied along the jet core and shear layers, such that the estimated y+ at the nozzle exit based on the exit velocity was approximately 3. A detailed assessment of the present RANS simulations has been reported in a recent study by Zang et al (2018), where both mesh independence check and validation with available experimental measurements were carried out.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%