2005
DOI: 10.3133/sir20055152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of optical properties of dissolved organic material as quantitative source indicators in the Santa Ana River basin, Southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of optical properties as proxies for DOC concentration has been recognized for many years in the field of oceanography (Coble, 2007). Recently, several studies have shown that absorption coefficients (e.g., A 254 , A 330 , and A 440 ) and fluorescence at excitation 370 nm and emission 460 nm, defined here as fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM), are good predictors of DOC concentration in surface waters (e.g., Bergamaschi et al, 2005; Belzile et al, 2006; Downing et al, 2009; Saraceno et al, 2009). In this dataset, fluorescence was a better predictor of DOC concentration than A 254 (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of optical properties as proxies for DOC concentration has been recognized for many years in the field of oceanography (Coble, 2007). Recently, several studies have shown that absorption coefficients (e.g., A 254 , A 330 , and A 440 ) and fluorescence at excitation 370 nm and emission 460 nm, defined here as fluorescent dissolved organic matter (FDOM), are good predictors of DOC concentration in surface waters (e.g., Bergamaschi et al, 2005; Belzile et al, 2006; Downing et al, 2009; Saraceno et al, 2009). In this dataset, fluorescence was a better predictor of DOC concentration than A 254 (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the information obtained through fluorescence measurements is not as definitive as molecular biomarker analyses, fluorescence data are still directly tied to the chemical composition of dissolved constituents, and as such can be used to determine DOM source and processing history. A number of studies have related fluorescence properties of natural waters to the concentration, source and composition of DOM [e.g., Bergamaschi et al , 2005; McKnight et al , 2001; Stedmon et al , 2003]. For example, certain features in fluorescence excitation emission matrices (EEMs) such as hypsochromic shifts in peaks attributed to humic and fulvic‐like material have been attributed to a breakdown in aromaticity [ Blough and Del Vecchio , 2002; Coble , 1996] and thus have been used to distinguish between allochthonous and autochthonous‐derived DOM [ Spencer et al , 2007a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in optical sensor technology have made it possible to use in-situ fluorometers to quantify DOM concentration and composition. Specifically, the fluorescing component of DOM (FDOM) can be measured continuously and used as a reliable proxy for concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC); with the addition of other signals such as turbidity, FDOM also can be used to estimate particulate organic carbon (POC) and total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations (Bergamaschi et al, 2005Pellerin et al, 2012;Saraceno et al, 2009;Spencer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Background and Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%