2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of physical aspects for seismic response capacity in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last row of Table 4 shows that the construction quality of all high-rise buildings, including those with 6-10 stories, have high-level nonconformity. This constitutes a serious threat to the occupants, investors/developers, and the construction quality control authority as Bangladesh is an earthquake-and other natural disasters-prone country, which sharply increases vulnerability to structural collapse (Apu and Das 2020;Omar et al 2021). However, although the construction quality of private low-rise academic and high-rise commercial buildings is generally quite good (nonconformity scores below 0.30), such factors as premature concrete stressing (CQ6), consultant/designer not invited for supervision (MC3), and insufficient periodic laboratory testing of materials (MC6) have a very low score (less than 0.10), which severely reduces their average nonconformity score.…”
Section: Nonconformities With Project Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last row of Table 4 shows that the construction quality of all high-rise buildings, including those with 6-10 stories, have high-level nonconformity. This constitutes a serious threat to the occupants, investors/developers, and the construction quality control authority as Bangladesh is an earthquake-and other natural disasters-prone country, which sharply increases vulnerability to structural collapse (Apu and Das 2020;Omar et al 2021). However, although the construction quality of private low-rise academic and high-rise commercial buildings is generally quite good (nonconformity scores below 0.30), such factors as premature concrete stressing (CQ6), consultant/designer not invited for supervision (MC3), and insufficient periodic laboratory testing of materials (MC6) have a very low score (less than 0.10), which severely reduces their average nonconformity score.…”
Section: Nonconformities With Project Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al [22] investigated a new approach that tackled seismic resilience of road networks effected by earthquake hazards, by leveraging post-shock rapid responses as the key to minimize the functionality losses of the network, especially in the immediate aftermath of earthquakes. Omar et al [23] analyzed the physical seismic emergency response capacity in Dhaka, Bangladesh by developing five indicators and one of them is rescue and evacuation accessibility where the road network within the city is studied during seismic hazard.…”
Section: Seismic Risk Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%