2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl080678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Assessment of Representation of Oceanic Mesoscale Eddy‐Atmosphere Interaction in the Current Generation of General Circulation Models and Reanalyses

Abstract: Oceanic mesoscale eddies interact strongly with the atmosphere, inducing heat flux that acts to dissipate the eddy potential energy. So far it remains unknown how well this oceanic mesoscale eddy‐atmosphere (OMEA) interaction is represented in the current generation of general circulation models. Here we evaluate the intensity of OMEA interaction in numerical models widely used by the community. It is found that the intensity of OMEA interaction differs significantly among models in its overall magnitude and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite such progress, a major knowledge gap remains in the understanding of small-scale air-sea heat and moisture fluxes associated with mesoscale SST and their impacts on weather and climate. There is mounting evidence that there are intense interactions between the atmosphere and ocean on the scales of ocean eddies, and the need for improved resolution of observational systems is growing as these scales appear to impact weather and climate simulations (e.g., [25,26]). Recent research relates our inability to accurately represent ~25 km oceanic forcing of atmospheric features from synoptic to seasonal timescales to our lack of skill in predicting extreme events like drought, flooding, and heat waves [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Figure 1 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite such progress, a major knowledge gap remains in the understanding of small-scale air-sea heat and moisture fluxes associated with mesoscale SST and their impacts on weather and climate. There is mounting evidence that there are intense interactions between the atmosphere and ocean on the scales of ocean eddies, and the need for improved resolution of observational systems is growing as these scales appear to impact weather and climate simulations (e.g., [25,26]). Recent research relates our inability to accurately represent ~25 km oceanic forcing of atmospheric features from synoptic to seasonal timescales to our lack of skill in predicting extreme events like drought, flooding, and heat waves [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Figure 1 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eddy current's imprint on wind stress acts to dissipate EKE (Eden & Dietze, 2009;Renault et al, 2016), while the SSTAs carried by eddies induce a dipolar wind stress curl anomaly, affecting eddies' propagation through Ekman pumping (Gaube et al, 2015;Seo et al, 2016). More recently, the turbulent heat flux anomalies induced by eddies are found to damp mesoscale SSTAs (Bishop et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017), leading to a destruction of EPE (Ma et al, 2016;Yang et al, 2018) (referred to as the OME-A EPE feedback henceforth). A particular question this study attempts to address is as follows: Can this OME-A EPE feedback affect the large-scale SST by regulating the vertical eddy heat transport through its impact on the EPE budget?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary and initial conditions are obtained from a parent ROMS simulation configured over the North Pacific (998-2708E, 3.68-668N) with 9-km horizontal resolution and 50 vertical levels. The effects of atmosphere synoptic forcing, eddy thermal and current feedbacks are all included in CTRL, although the eddy thermal and current feedbacks tend to be moderately overestimated due to the lack of atmosphere's adjustment to eddy-induced SST and current anomalies (Renault et al 2016;Yang et al 2018), which is acceptable for our qualitative analysis. Accurate representation of these feedbacks requires coupled simulations that are currently challenging at 1-km resolution.…”
Section: A Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%