2008 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium 2008
DOI: 10.1109/plans.2008.4570123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assisted high-sensitivity acquisition technique for GPS indoor positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out in [ 2 ], there are three factors that cause loss of measured correlation value: the bit transition, the residual code in the autocorrelation function , and the residual frequency. The solution of residual code and data transition can be found in [ 18 , 19 ]. Moreover, some modern GNSS signals introduce pilot channels, which do not contain data bits.…”
Section: Residual Carrier Frequency Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out in [ 2 ], there are three factors that cause loss of measured correlation value: the bit transition, the residual code in the autocorrelation function , and the residual frequency. The solution of residual code and data transition can be found in [ 18 , 19 ]. Moreover, some modern GNSS signals introduce pilot channels, which do not contain data bits.…”
Section: Residual Carrier Frequency Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the accuracy of the evaluated estimators, two signal conditions are considered. The first one is the nominal range of , which is 35 dB-Hz and above [ 18 , 26 ], and the second one is the weak signals, in which is in the range of dB-Hz. In the nominal conditions, the integration time equals 1 ms and the number of combinations are adequate to detect and track the signal [ 7 ].…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing indoor localization solutions for building emergency response operations, either proposed in the academia [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] or are available in the market [24,25], were developed in the absence of clear knowledge about the needs of first responders if an indoor localization solution existed. This problem is even more obvious with indoor localization solutions developed for general purposes using various technologies such as inertial navigation systems (INS) [26][27][28], assisted GPS (AGPS) [29][30][31], and infrared [32][33][34], as well as a couple of RF technologies including ultra wide band (UWB) [35][36][37], radio frequency identification (RFID) [38][39][40][41], wireless local area network (WLAN) [42][43][44][45], and wireless sensor networks (WSN) [46][47][48]. For example, most existing solutions predominantly emphasized their high accuracies; however, none of them argued what level of accuracy is sufficient to support emergency response operations while not becoming over demanding in terms of supporting infrastructure or prior data input, or to what extent an accuracy should be retained when a solution is challenged by hazards such as fire and structural collapses.…”
Section: Need Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum practical integration period is limited by the relative dynamics of the receiver, amongst other factors [12]. With aiding, the effect of relative dynamics can be compensated and then the main challenge is the requirement for a precise oscillator to overcome the oscillator instability affecting the coherent integration period [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%