2001
DOI: 10.1039/b103437p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An atmospheric pressure glow discharge optical emission source for the direct sampling of liquid media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig 2, the most intensive bands in emission spectrum are the bands of the N 2 second positive system (C 3 u →B 3 g transition). The OH band (A 2 →X 2 , 0-0) normally used for the temperature measurements (11) is also present, but the use of this band is not convenient. First, the OH band intensity is noticeably lower than the intensity of the N 2 bands.…”
Section: Methods Of Gas Temperature Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Fig 2, the most intensive bands in emission spectrum are the bands of the N 2 second positive system (C 3 u →B 3 g transition). The OH band (A 2 →X 2 , 0-0) normally used for the temperature measurements (11) is also present, but the use of this band is not convenient. First, the OH band intensity is noticeably lower than the intensity of the N 2 bands.…”
Section: Methods Of Gas Temperature Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, systematic experimental data on the gas temperature as well as on the gas phase composition are absent. Only one reference (11) reported the values of 4550-4275 K extracted from the OH band intensity for N 2 as the plasma forming gas. Thus, the main goal of this study is to obtain the systematic experimental data on the gas temperature, composition of exited species in the gas phase and electric field strength for the plasma-electrolyte system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, magnesium and mercury detection limits are only ∼20% different with the LS-APGD device, whereas the same elements differ by >3 orders of magnitude with the miniature SCGD. 25,29 The sampling mechanism in the LS-APGD apparatus is most likely somewhat different from that of the systems discussed earlier. In the ELCAD system, there is an element-dependent vaporization efficiency, 31 whereas in the LS-APGD system, the entire solution is vaporized.…”
Section: Liquid-sampling Atmospheric-pressure Glow Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injection-to-injection variations of <10% RSD are reported for concentrations in the hundreds of parts per million. 29,30 Concentration detection limits of 1-2 ppm and mass detection limits of 5-10 ng have been obtained for several metals. For example, magnesium and mercury detection limits are only ∼20% different with the LS-APGD device, whereas the same elements differ by >3 orders of magnitude with the miniature SCGD.…”
Section: Liquid-sampling Atmospheric-pressure Glow Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation